Steven P. Errington

The paper shows that macaque frontal cortex encodes ordinal position in auditory sequences through population dynamics, while auditory cortex encodes stimulus identity.

This paper identifies a prefrontal cortex-hypothalamus circuit that bidirectionally controls heart rate in non-human primates and shows its role in cognitive decision-making.

The paper identifies a lateralized readiness potential in macaque monkeys during saccadic eye movements, suggesting it correlates with neural spiking activity in the frontal eye field.

The paper re-examines the presence of a conflict signal in macaque cingulate cortex using higher-resolution data and finds conflict-modulating neurons, more common in dorsal cingulate than ventral, but more prevalent in supplementary motor cortex.

The paper examines the laminar organization of visually responsive neurons in the supplementary eye field of macaques during a saccade stop-signal task, revealing layer-specific response patterns and latency differences.

The paper uses biophysical modeling to identify the cellular mechanisms generating error-related negativity (ERN) and post-error positivity (Pe) in macaque supplementary eye field.

The paper investigates whether cortical β-bursts are more directly linked to response inhibition than EEG β-bursts, finding they are less frequent and not synchronized with EEG signals.

The paper investigates the laminar organization of neurons in the supplementary eye field during a stop-signal task and links their activity to event-related potentials (ERP) components.

This paper examines β-bursts in EEG during saccade countermanding tasks in macaques, finding they are too infrequent to explain stopping behavior and show no response time adaptation.

This study shows that monkeys can strategically produce express saccades during a countermanding task to maximize reward, revealing distinct mechanisms for short and longer latency saccades.

This study compares how visual noise affects contrast thresholds in humans and praying mantises, finding differences in masking effectiveness across spatial frequencies.

The paper shows that invisible noise can impair motion detection in insects but not mammals due to differences in early visual processing.