bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
Taxonomic revision of Leopold and Rudolf Blaschka Glass Models of Invertebrates 1888 Catalogue, with correction of authorities
Eric Callaghan, Bernhard Egger, Hazel Doyle, Emmanuel G. ReynaudiD
Abstract
The glass models of invertebrates crafted by Leopold and Rudolf Blaschka were made between 1863 and 1889. Production ceased when the glassmakers turned their attention to what is now known as the Ware Collection of Blaschka Glass Models of Plants, created for the Harvard Museum of Natural History. Nearly 130 years have passed since their last published catalogue of species in 1888 and the nomenclature they applied is now a confusing mix that includes many junior synonyms and unavailable names. This is an issue for many museums and universities which owns Blaschka models as uncertain identifications may compromised interpretation of this rediscovered legacy. Nowadays, many museums and universities hold collections of those glass invertebrates but misspelled, mislabelled or simply apply the century old taxonomy of 1888. Here, we provide a valuable resource for curators and enthusiasts alike. We studied and updated the final catalogue 1888 from the Blaschkas Dresden-based workshop. We first focused on major taxonomical changes from taxa to species, as well as on an analysis of the acknowledged authorities. We found that only 35.3% of the models retain their original names, while 3.7% lack any known synonym and their identity remains open to interpretation. Finally, two of the authorities listed in the catalogue, Ernst Haeckel and Philip Henry Gosse, were incorrectly acknowledged for an extensive range of models. This study is the first of its kind on the Blaschka collection, and it will help in the identification and naming of Blaschka models worldwide.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reply to Li et al. "Is Oculudentavis a bird or even archosaur?"
J. O'Connor, L. Xing, … Q. Yi·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2020
- Illustrating phylogenetic placement of fossils using RoguePlots: An example from ichneumonid parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) and an extensive morphological matrix
S. Klopfstein, T. Spasojevic·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2018
- The potential applications of high-resolution 3D scanners in the taxonomic classification of insects
Cameron J. Peacock, William Romeu‐Evans, … Christopher Hassall·Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2025
- A morphometric approach to the taxonomic dilemma of Zonozoe drabowiensis Barrande, 1872 and Zonoscutum solum Chlupá&ccaron, 1999 (Upper Ordovician, Czech Republic)
Lorenzo Lustri, Lukáš Laibl, … Stephen Pates·Swiss Journal of PalaeontologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2026
- Parachute geckos free fall into synonymy: Gekko phylogeny, and a new subgeneric classification, inferred from thousands of ultraconserved elements
P. L. Wood, X. Guo, … R. M. Brown·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2019
- Hybotidae (Diptera) of the Botanic Garden Jean Massart (Brussels-Capital Region, Belgium) with description of two new Platypalpus species and comments on the Red Data List
P. Grootaert·bioRxiv·Dec 26, 2022