The potential applications of high-resolution 3D scanners in the taxonomic classification of insects
Cameron J. PeacockiD, William Romeu‐Evans, Simon J. GoodmaniD, Christopher HassalliD
Abstract
The phenotypic classification of small biological specimens, such as insects, can be dependent on phenotypic features that are difficult to observe and communicate to others. Here, we evaluate how high-resolution 3D photogrammetric scanner technology can potentially allow such features to be resolved and visualised as a 3D models, which can then be shared as a taxonomical resource for species identification, as virtual type specimens, and for educational and public engagement purposes. We test the viability and limitations of this approach using specimens digitised with a Artec Micro scanner. Ten samples from unique species were mounted and scanned. The model outputs were evaluated against an identification key, which compiled diagnostic features for the specimens from the wider literature, to describe the specimens to the lowest taxonomic level possible. The results showed that six of the ten specimens could be identified to species level using the scans. Threshold values for body length and width were 10.7 mm and 4.4 mm respectively. Below these body dimensions important diagnostic features of specimens could not be resolved reliably. This result suggests that with current technology, 3D photogrammetric modelling is a viable method for taxonomic identification of a wide range of insect groups with larger body sizes. This approach opens up novel applications for species identification and data sharing among taxonomists, international field research, conservation efforts, and entomological outreach. However, the limitations of this approach to taxonomic identification must be considered depending upon the size of the specimen and its diagnostic features. Future developments in the technology and processing methods used may alleviate the constraints on body size exhibited in this study, widening the applications for smaller bodied specimens.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 39%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High throughput photogrammetric measurement of morphological traits in free-ranging phototropic insects
M. Mungee, R. Athreya·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2019
- Insect Size Matters: Using Image and Dimensions Together Improves Image Classification
Melika Baghooee, Quentin Geissmann·Ecological InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2026
- Images in red: A methodological and integrative approach for the usage of Near-infrared Hyperspectral Imaging (NIR-HSI) on collection specimens of Orthoptera (Insecta)
GUSTAVO COSTA TAVARES, Neirivaldo Cavalcante da Silva, … José Antônio Marin Fernandes·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2024
- Towards a Taxonomy Machine. A Training Set of 5.6 Million Arthropod Images
Dirk Steinke, Sujeevan Ratnasingham, … Paul D. N. Hebert·DataPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2024
- PicoCam: High-resolution 3D imaging of live animals and preserved specimens
Josh Medina, Duncan J. Irschick, … Alejandro Rico‐Guevara·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2024
- What do we know about the missing millions of Earths insect species and can we improve their collection: evidence from bark beetles?
Nigel E. Stork, Michael J. W. Boyle, … R. A. Beaver·Insect Conservation and DiversityPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2024