bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
LoAR-Exo and HiAR-Exo: One-step label-free isolation of extracellular vesicles using inertial microfluidic devices
Sourav AcharyaiD, Moein Talebian GevariiD, Ashwin Anandhapadman, Shreya Karandikar, Haimanti MukherjeeiD, Fredrik StridfeldtiD, Sayani DasiD, Petra HåågiD, Nupur Rani AgarwaliD, Rolf LewensohniD, Kristina ViktorssoniD, Sandip KaledhonkariD, Prakriti TayaliaiD, Apurba DeviD, Debjani PauliD
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid membrane-bound nanoscale (20 nm - 1000 nm) objects shed by all cells. As EVs play an important role in intercellular signaling, these have emerged as promising biomarkers for many diseases including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. A major bottleneck in research into EVs and their smooth translation to clinic as disease biomarkers is a lack of access to affordable and user-friendly technologies to quickly isolate EVs from complex biological and clinical samples with acceptable purity and yield. Here, we report two different designs of inertial microfluidic devices (e.g. LoAR-Exo and HiAR-Exo) that can isolate EVs from different kinds of biological samples in a single label-free step using a spiral microchannel design with different aspect ratios. LoAR-Exo has a height-to-width aspect ratio [~] 1, while HiAR-Exo has a height-to-width aspect ratio of 2.5, optimized by COMSOL simulations. We tested both designs by separating polystyrene particles of size < 1 m from a heterogeneous mixture. We then benchmarked the performance of the microfluidic chips against ultracentrifugation and a precipitation kit by isolating EVs from the cell culture-conditioned media (CCM) of MDA-MB-231 cells. We also compared the microchip with SEC by using the CCM from H1975/OR cells. The size distribution of EVs isolated by the microfluidic chip was comparable with ultracentrifugation, precipitation and SEC. In summary, both devices isolated EVs from as little as 1 mL of sample volume using a label-free technique in a continuous manner and without any user intervention. Both microfluidic platforms offer a simple, efficient, and scalable alternative to conventional methods for EV isolation.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Scalable, high-throughput isolation of extracellular vesicles using electrokinetic-assisted mesh filtration
KangMin Lee, Minju Bae, … Sehyun Shin·Journal of Extracellular BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2025
- Method for isolation of small extracellular vesicles from different biofluids and workflow for Mass Spectrometry based-shotgun proteomics and RNA isolation
Pratibha Sharma, Rajinder Kumar Dhamija·BMC MethodsPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2025
- Cutting-edge microfluidic technology allows detection and sorting of single fluorescent extracellular vesicles
Mickaël Couty, Kimhuong Say, … Guillaume van Niel·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2026
- VDisk: A Microfluidic Cartridge for Automated and Reproducible Label-Free Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles from Plasma
Ehsan Mahmodi Arjmand, Gustav Grether, … Jan Lüddecke·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2025
- Rapid and high yield isolation of extracellular vesicles with purity by application of size exclusion fast performance liquid chromatography.
K. Kapoor, K. Harris, … R. Kalluri·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2023
- Framework for Rapid Comparison of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods
D. Ter-Ovanesyan, M. Norman, … D. R. Walt·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 16, 2021