Ordering structured populations in multiplayer cooperation games
Abstract
Spatial structure greatly affects the evolution of cooperation. While in two-player games the condition for cooperation to evolve depends on a single structure coefficient, in multiplayer games the condition might depend on several structure coefficients, making it difficult to compare different population structures. We propose a solution to this issue by introducing two simple ways of ordering population structures: the containment order and the volume order. If population structure [S]1 is greater than population structure [S]2 in the containment or the volume order, then [S]1 can be considered a stronger promoter of cooperation. We provide conditions for establishing the containment order, give general results on the volume order, and illustrate our theory by comparing different models of spatial games and associated update rules. Our results hold for a large class of population structures and can be easily applied to specific cases once the structure coefficients have been calculated or estimated.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evolutionary games of multiplayer cooperation on graphs
Jorge Peña, Bin Wu, … Arne Traulsen·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2016
- Promotion of cooperation in deme-structured populations with growth-merging dynamics
Damien Ribière, Alia Abbara, Anne‐Florence Bitbol·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2026
- Evolution of cooperation in deme-structured populations on graphs
A. Moawad, A. Abbara, A.-F. Bitbol·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2023
- Antisocial rewarding in structured populations
M. dos Santos, J. Pena·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2017
- Eco-evolutionary spatial dynamics of non-linear social dilemmas
C. S. Gokhale, H. J. Park·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2019
- Population structure reduces the benefits from partner choice in mutualism
Erol Akçay·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2016