henhaobio
Sign in

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infects approximately one-third of the worlds human population and kills over one million people each year. HBV is also prevalent in Old World apes but not in New World primates. Human-to-primate transmission of HBV was suspected in zoo-captive monkeys and Mauritius macaques, but empirical data are scarce. Here, we collected blood and liver samples from 88 monkeys of 27 species in two areas of the Amazon, one with pristine forest and the other highly occupied and deforested by humans. A total of 17 (34.7%) out of 49 specimens from the human-occupied region tested positive for HBV. At this site, there was a positive relationship between human population density in the sampling location and the likelihood of primates being infected by HBV. Conversely, all 39 samples from the pristine forest tested negative for HBV. By sequencing a portion of the HBV S gene in five positive samples, each from a distinct primate genus, we found that four samples were closely related to the globally widespread human HBV-A strain, but not to the Americas-native HBV-F strain. The fifth sample aligned with the human HBV-D type, prevalent in the region where these samples were obtained. To our knowledge, this study represents the first reported cases of HBV in multiple wild New World primate species anywhere in the world. Our results suggest that primates were infected by strains brought into this part of Brazil by human immigrants, where HBV transmission may have been facilitated by the close contact between humans and monkeys due to high human occupation. This shows that the impact of human immigration, occupation and population growth in the Amazon extends beyond habitat loss; it also facilitates cross-species infections, potentially leading to the emergence of new, virulent viral strains that threaten both Amazonian biodiversity and human health. Author SummaryJean P. Boubli: Professor in Primate Ecology and Evolution, School of Science, Engineering and the Environment, University of Salford, Uk Hani R. El Bizri: PhD in Wildlife Conservation with a focus on Amazonian sustainable development. Analyst of Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia Luan F. Botelho-Souza: Masters and doctorate in experimental biology at the Universidade Federal de Rondonia/Brazil, Chrysoula Gubili: Researcher at the Fisheries Research Institute Nea Peramos, Kavala, Greece, specializing in population ecology and conservation genetics. Stephen J. Martin: Professor in Social Insects, School of Science, Engineering and the Environment, University of Salford, Uk Maisa da S. Araujo: Masters and doctorate in experimental biology, at the Universidade Federal de Rondonia/Brazil, Mariluce R. Messias: Professor of Zoology and curator of the Mammalogy Museum at the Universidade Federal de Rondonia/Brazil. Alcione de O. dos Santos: Masters and doctorate in experimental biology at the Universidade Federal de Rondonia/Brazil. Luiz S. Ozaki: Masters degree from Universidade de Brasilia and PhD in Physiological Sciences, Molecular Biology in Fukuoka, Kyushu, Japan. Andre V.C. Pereira: Bachelor in Biology the Universidade Federal de Rondonia/Brazil. Tony H. Katsuragawa: Masters and doctorate in experimental biology, at the Universidade Federal de Rondonia/Brazil. Ana Maisa Passos-Silva: Masters degree in experimental biology from the Federal University of Rondonia/Brazil. Luiz H. S. Gil: Masters in experimental biology, at the Universidade Federal de Rondonia/Brazil. Izeni P. Farias: Professor of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Brazil Juan M.V. Salcedo: Master in Tropical Medicine from the University of Brasilia/Brazil and PhD in Sciences from the University of Sao Paulo/Brazil. Tommy C. Burch: Masters in Biological Sciences and PhD candidate from the University of Salford, UK. Deusilene Vieira: Master in Tropical Medicine from the University of Brasilia/Brazil and PhD in Sciences from the University of Sao Paulo/Brazil.

In-depth summary

Claude Sonnet 4.6 · xhigh effort · 8 Nov 2026 · from the full text of version 1 (2 Nov 2024) · CC BY 4.0

Sequenced HBV from wild Amazonian primates in a deforested, densely settled region matched human genotypes A and D, while pristine-forest monkeys were all negative, consistent with human-to-primate spillover.

Human-to-animal viral transmission is rarely documented, and only three cases of HBV had been reported in New World primates. This work tests whether human settlement of the Amazon has introduced HBV into wild monkeys across several genera.

Key results

  1. ShownHBV was found in wild primates sampled in the heavily settled, deforested southwestern Amazon but in none of the monkeys from the remote upper Japura River.

    Rondônia blood samples: 17 (34.7%) HBV-positive (49 samples of 17 species sampled). Japura liver tissues: 0 of 39 positive (11 species). · Results; Materials and Methods

  2. ShownSequenced primate HBV clustered with human genotypes, not with the distinct ape lineages: four species fell in the genotype A clade and one in the genotype D clade.

    547-bp S gene fragment, 5 of 17 positives sequenced (one per genus). Alouatta puruensis, Ateles chamek, Pithecia irrorata and Sapajus apella in HBV-A; Callicebus bruneus in HBV-D. Bayesian trees. · Results; Materials and Methods; Figure legends

  3. SuggestedAcross capture sites, the chance of a primate testing HBV-positive was higher where human population density was higher, pointing to human occupation as a driver of infection.

    GLMM (gamlss, binomial, species as random factor, AIC stepwise selection): coefficient 0.13, t-value 2.11, p-value 0.039. · Results; Materials and Methods

  4. SuggestedThe genotypes found in primates (A, then D) match the most common human strains in the same region, which the authors read as support for human-to-primate transmission.

    HBV-A most prevalent in humans in Rondônia, followed by D. Primate sequences compared with Rondônia patient sequences; 57.7% of the regional population are non-native inhabitants. · Discussion; Materials and Methods

Methods, data and reproducibility

Wild primates from two Amazon sites were screened for HBV by PCR. Five positives were sequenced (547-bp S gene) and placed in Bayesian phylogenies with human and ape HBV. A GLMM tested human density, deforestation and GDP per capita.

  • Blood serum from wild-caught primates, southwestern Amazonia (Rondônia and two nearby cities), 2009 to 2013; high human occupation and deforestation · New World primates (17 species) · n = 49 samples of 17 species
  • Liver tissues from voucher specimens, remote upper Japura River region (pristine forest) · New World primates (11 species) · n = 39 samples of 11 species
  • Reference HBV sequences: human genotypes A to H, gorilla, chimpanzee, gibbon, orangutan and Louisville Zoo woolly monkey · human; apes; woolly monkey · AF046996 (woolly monkey); other accessions listed in S5
  • HBV sequences from patients in Rondônia, compared directly with primate sequences · human · HM101096-100, HM101102, HM101104-12, HM101114-30
Methods & tools
Duplex and nested PCR for HBV, ABI Prism 377 sequencer, ProSeq 3.0, CLUSTALX 2.1, MrModeltest 2.3 (GTR+I+G), MrBayes 3.2, R gamlss package (GLMM), RStudio 2023.09.1+494, Akaike Information Criterion stepwise selection
Reagents & environment
RStudio 2023.09.1+494 with gamlss; CLUSTALX 2.1; MrModeltest 2.3; MrBayes 3.2 (10,000,000 generations, sampling every 100 generations, first 10% discarded as burn-in).
Reproducibility gaps
No analysis code is provided. The full alignment is on a Google Drive link. Accessions for the five new primate sequences are not stated. Per-sample results are in Table S1, a supplement not reproduced here.
Limitations (2)
  • The two sites differ in sample type (blood serum vs liver tissue) and extraction method as well as in human pressure, so the positive vs negative contrast may partly reflect assay sensitivity rather than spillover. · noted in this summary
  • Only 5 of 17 positives were sequenced, using a 547-bp S gene fragment. The GLMM response coding (positive as 0, negative as 1) makes the coefficient's sign hard to interpret. Direction of transmission rests on phylogenetic grouping and the absence of positives at the remote site. · noted in this summary

Read this if you study reverse zoonosis, viral spillover from humans to wildlife, or disease risk in human-modified tropical forests.

Citations
3
FWCI
15.20
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.