Disulphide and sequence-encoded conformational priors guide nanobody structure prediction
Montader AliiD, Mateusz JaskółowskiiD, Matthew GreenigiD, Tung H. Nguyen, Mia Crnogaj, Eva SmorodinaiD, Aubin RamoniD, Haowen ZhaoiD, Monica L. Fernández‐QuinteroiD, Elodie GhediniD, Victor GreiffiD, Pietro SormanniiD
Abstract
Nanobody binding is largely governed by the HCDR3 loop, which adopts distinct placement regimes relative to the framework: compact, framework-contacting (kinked blueprint) and solvent-exposed (extended blueprint). Many nanobodies also contain additional cysteines that form non-canonical disulphide bonds, imposing covalent constraints on binding-loop conformations. Current structure predictors are typically trained and benchmarked with smooth coordinate-based objectives, so models may appear reasonable under root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), while adopting an incorrect HCDR3 blueprint or failing to recover the native disulphide connectivity, impacting paratope geometry and functional interpretation. Here, we show that the HCDR3 blueprint is predictable from sequence alone, allowing for explicit constraints during modelling. We implement these principles into NbForge, a lightweight nanobody folding model that incorporates blueprint- and disulphide-aware inductive biases and is trained with filtered self-distillation. NbForge improves recovery of HCDR3 blueprint and non-canonical disulphide formation over previous lightweight models and achieves coordinate accuracy at par to state-of-the-art, large, resource-intensive predictors, while running at sub-second inference speed. We show that using NbForge monomer models as templates further improves the success rate of predicting nanobody-antigen complexes. Together, these results motivate blueprint- and disulphide-aware benchmarks for nanobody modelling beyond RMSD, and show that appropriate inductive biases can close the performance gap to heavyweight predictors. We make the sequence classifier (NbFrame) and NbForge available for download and via a user-friendly web server.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improving nanobody structure prediction with self-distillation
Montader Ali, Matthew Greenig, … Pietro Sormanni·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2025
- Assessing Structural Prediction Accuracy for Nanobody-Small Molecule Complexes
Berta Bori-Bru, J.‐Pablo Salvador, Ramón Crehuet·DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))Peer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2026
- Combining AI structure prediction and integrative modelling for nanobody-antigen complexes
Miguel Sánchez-Marín, Marco Giulini, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2025
- A benchmark study of protein folding algorithms on nanobodies
Shibo Liang, Ziquan Liang, … Xin Wang·International Conference on Communications, Computing and Artificial Intelligence (CCCAI)Peer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2023
- Adaptive disorder as the hallmark of nanobodies antigen-binding loops
Davide Bagordo, Gauthier Trèves, … Francesco Lescai·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·May 22, 2026
- H3-OPT: Accurate prediction of CDR-H3 loop structures of antibodies with deep learning
Hedi Chen, Xiaoyu Fan, … Boxue Tian·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2024