Strong Reward Signals, Weak Transfer: Limits of Spatial Priority Map Plasticity Across Task Contexts
Olgerta AskoiD, Maria StavrinouiD, Thomas HageniD, Thomas EspesethiD
Abstract
Reward learning can bias attentional selection, but whether spatially biased reinforcement produces durable, context-general changes in spatial priority over days, and what neurophysiological signals track such learning, remains uncertain. We combined electroencephalography (EEG) and pupillometry with a multi-session spatial reward-learning paradigm (Chelazzi et al., 2014) in which targets could appear at eight locations and reward probability was systematically biased across locations during two days of training. A separate baseline/test visual detection task was administered before training and again four days after training to assess delayed transfer under cross-target competition. Training produced strong reward signals across measures. Feedback-locked ERPs (FRN and P300) differentiated outcome valence and reward magnitude and varied systematically with time-on-task, while pupil dilation was larger following high- than low-reward feedback and overall task-evoked responses decreased across blocks. Reward history also modulated stimulus-locked target processing: targets at high- versus low-reward locations differed reliably across N1/N2 and a late positivity, indicating multi-stage value-dependent influences on visual processing during active learning. In contrast, transfer was weak in both behavior and ERPs: behavioral indices did not show a reliable advantage for highly rewarded locations at delayed test, and neural evidence for persistence was limited to an N2 modulation in the most diagnostic high-versus-low comparison, which should be interpreted cautiously given low trial counts. Accordingly, we did not replicate the robust long-term spatial priority effect reported in the original study. Together, these findings reveal strong reward-learning signals but weak cross-task transfer, suggesting limits on how readily spatial reward learning consolidates into persistent, task-general spatial priority-map plasticity across contexts.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Where is the money? Dynamics in feedback processing and attention during spatial probabilistic learning
Celina Pütz, Berry van den Berg, Monicque M. Lorist·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2021
- Neural Correlates of Value-Driven Spatial Attention
Ming‐Ray Liao, Andy J. Kim, Brian A. Anderson·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2020
- Previously reward-associated stimuli capture spatial attention in the absence of changes in the corresponding sensory representations as measured with MEG
Lev Tankelevitch, Eelke Spaak, … Mark G. Stokes·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 4, 2020
- The Effects of Learnability and Reward Responsiveness on Reward Processing
Abigail Oloriz, Olave E. Krigolson, Cameron Dale Hassall·bioRxiv·May 22, 2026
- Interaction of spatial attention and the associated reward value of audiovisual stimuli
Roman Vakhrushev, Arezoo Pooresmaeili·CortexPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2024
- Spatiotemporal characterization of the neural correlates of outcome valence and surprise during reward learning in humans
Elsa Florence Fouragnan, Filippo Queirazza, … Marios G. Philiastides·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2017