Population-level inference for home-range areas
C. H. Fleming, I. Deznabi, S. Alavi, M. C. Crofoot, B. T. Hirsch, E. P. Medici, M. J. Noonan, R. Kays, W. F. Fagan, D. Sheldon, J. M. Calabrese
Abstract
O_LIHome-range estimates are a common product of animal tracking data, as each range informs on the area needed by a given individual. Population-level inference on home-range areas--where multiple individual home-ranges are considered to be sampled from a population--is also important to evaluate changes over time, space, or covariates, such as habitat quality or fragmentation, and for comparative analyses of species averages. Population-level home-range parameters have traditionally been estimated by first assuming that the input tracking data were sampled independently when calculating home ranges via conventional kernel density estimation (KDE) or minimal convex polygon (MCP) methods, and then assuming that those individual home ranges were measured exactly when calculating the population-level estimates. This conventional approach does not account for the temporal autocorrelation that is inherent in modern tracking data, nor for the uncertainties of each individual home-range estimate, which are often large and heterogeneous. C_LIO_LIHere, we introduce a statistically and computationally efficient framework for the population-level analysis of home-range areas, based on autocorrelated kernel density estimation (AKDE), that can account for variable temporal autocorrelation and estimation uncertainty. C_LIO_LIWe apply our method to empirical examples on lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris), kinkajou (Potos flavus), white-nosed coati (Nasua narica), white-faced capuchin monkey (Cebus capucinus), and spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi), and quantify differences between species, environments, and sexes. C_LIO_LIOur approach allows researchers to more accurately compare different populations with different movement behaviors or sampling schedules, while retaining statistical precision and power when individual home-range uncertainties vary. Finally, we emphasize the estimation of effect sizes when comparing populations, rather than mere significance tests. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimating population range distributions from animal tracking data
Gayatri Anand, Christen H. Fleming, … William F. Fagan·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2025
- ctmmweb: A graphical user interface for autocorrelation-informed home range estimation
J. M. Calabrese, C. H. Fleming, … X. Dong·bioRxiv·May 11, 2020
- Home range spillover in habitats with impassable boundaries: Causes, biases, and corrections using autocorrelated kernel density estimation
Jack Hollins, Christen H. Fleming, … Nigel Edward Hussey·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2025
- A fresh look at an old concept: Home-range estimation in a tidy world
J. Signer, J. Fieberg·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2020
- Are trapping data still suited for home range estimation? An analysis with various estimators, asymptotic models and data ordering procedures
L. Socias-Martinez, L. R. Peckre, M. J. Noonan·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2022
- Clarifying space use concepts in ecology: range vs. occurrence distributions
J. M. Alston, C. H. Fleming, … W. F. Fagan·EcologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2026