Methods in Ecology and EvolutionEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Home range spillover in habitats with impassable boundaries: Causes, biases, and corrections using autocorrelated kernel density estimation
Jack Hollins, Christen H. FlemingiD, Justin M. CalabreseiD, Les N. HarrisiD, Jean Sebastien Moore, Brendan K. MalleyiD, Michael James NoonaniD, William F. FaganiD, Jesse M. AlstoniD, Nigel Edward HusseyiD
Abstract
O_LIAn animals home range plays a fundamental role in determining its resource use and overlap with conspecifics, competitors and predators, and is therefore a common focus of movement ecology studies. Autocorrelated kernel density estimation addresses many of the shortcomings of traditional home range estimators when animal tracking data is autocorrelated, but other challenges in home range estimation remain. C_LIO_LIOne such issue is known as spillover bias, in which home range estimates do not respect impassable movement boundaries (e.g., shorelines, fences), and occurs in all forms of kernel density estimation. While several approaches to addressing spillover bias are used when estimating home ranges, these approaches introduce bias throughout the remaining home range area, depending on the amount of spillover removed, or are otherwise inaccessible to most ecologists. Here, we introduce local corrections to home range kernels to mitigate spillover bias in (autocorrelated) kernel density estimation in the continuous time movement model (ctmm) package, and demonstrate their performance using simulations with known home range extents and distributions, and a real world case study. C_LIO_LISimulation results showed that local corrections minimised bias in bounded home range area estimates, and resulted in more accurate distributions when compared to commonly used post-hoc corrections, particularly at small-intermediate sample sizes. C_LIO_LIComparison of the impacts of local vs post-hoc corrections to bounded home ranges estimated from lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) demonstrated that local corrections constrained bias within the remaining home range area, resulting in proportionally smaller home range areas compared to when post-hoc corrections are used. C_LI
- assay: imaging
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: trajectory inference
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Population-level inference for home-range areas
C. H. Fleming, I. Deznabi, … J. M. Calabrese·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2021
- Clarifying space use concepts in ecology: range vs. occurrence distributions
J. M. Alston, C. H. Fleming, … W. F. Fagan·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2022
- Are trapping data still suited for home range estimation? An analysis with various estimators, asymptotic models and data ordering procedures
L. Socias-Martinez, L. R. Peckre, M. J. Noonan·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2022
- ctmmweb: A graphical user interface for autocorrelation-informed home range estimation
J. M. Calabrese, C. H. Fleming, … X. Dong·bioRxiv·May 11, 2020
- Edge-focused network-based approach: an improved kernel density estimator for home range
J. Vyasanakere, J. R. Mukherjee, R. J. Fernandez·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2022
- A fresh look at an old concept: Home-range estimation in a tidy world
J. Signer, J. Fieberg·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2020