Towards robust clinical genome interpretation: developing a consistent terminology to characterize disease-gene relationships - allelic requirement, inheritance modes and disease mechanisms
Angharad M. RobertsiD, Marina T. DiStefanoiD, Erin Rooney RiggsiD, Katherine S. JosephsiD, Fowzan Sami AlkurayaiD, Joanna S. AmbergeriD, Mutaz AminiD, Jonathan S. BergiD, Fiona M CunninghamiD, Karen L EilbeckiD, Helen V. FirthiD, Julia ForemaniD, Ada HamoshiD, Eleanor HayiD, Sarah E. A. LeighiD, Christa Lese MartiniD, Ellen M. McDonaghiD, Daniel PerrettiD, Erin M. RamosiD, Peter N. RobinsoniD, Ana RathiD, David SantiD, Zornitza StarkiD, Nicola WhiffiniD, Heidi L. RehmiD, James S. WareiD
Abstract
PURPOSEThe terminology used for gene-disease curation and variant annotation to describe inheritance, allelic requirement, and both sequence and functional consequences of a variant is currently not standardized. There is considerable discrepancy in the literature and across clinical variant reporting in the derivation and application of terms. Here we standardize the terminology for the characterization of disease-gene relationships to facilitate harmonized global curation, and to support variant classification within the ACMG/AMP framework. METHODSTerminology for inheritance, allelic requirement, and both structural and functional consequences of a variant used by Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC) members and partner organizations was collated and reviewed. Harmonized terminology with definitions and use examples was created, reviewed, and validated. RESULTSWe present a standardized terminology to describe gene-disease relationships, and to support variant annotation. We demonstrate application of the terminology for classification of variation in the ACMG SF 2.0 genes recommended for reporting of secondary findings. Consensus terms were agreed and formalized in both sequence ontology (SO) and human phenotype ontology (HPO) ontologies. GenCC member groups intend to use or map to these terms in their respective resources. CONCLUSIONThe terminology standardization presented here will improve harmonization, facilitate the pooling of curation datasets across international curation efforts and, in turn, improve consistency in variant classification and genetic test interpretation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 20
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Gene Curation Coalition: A global effort to harmonize gene-disease evidence resources
Marina T. DiStefano, Scott R. Goehringer, … Heidi L. Rehm·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 4, 2022
- ClinGen Variant Curation Interface: A Variant Classification Platform for the Application of Evidence Criteria from ACMG/AMP Guidelines
Christine G. Preston, Matt W. Wright, … Helio A. Costa·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2022
- ClinGen Expert Clinical Validity Curation of 164 Hearing Loss Gene-Disease Pairs
Marina T. DiStefano, Sarah E. Hemphill, … Keijan Zhang·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2019
- ClinGen CDH1 specifications for the ACMG/AMP guidelines: improvement of germline variant clinical assertions and updated curation guidelines
Xi Luo, Jamie L. Maciaszek, … Rachid Karam·medRxiv·Nov 1, 2021
- Evaluating the clinical validity of gene-disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the Clinical Genome Resource
Natasha T. Strande, Erin Rooney Riggs, … Jonathan S. Berg·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 25, 2017
- Curating genomic disease-gene relationships with Gene2Phenotype
T. Michael Yates, Morad Ansari, … Helen V. Firth·medRxiv·Feb 26, 2024