The Gene Curation Coalition: A global effort to harmonize gene-disease evidence resources
Marina T. DiStefanoiD, Scott R. GoehringeriD, Lawrence J. BabbiD, Fowzan Sami AlkurayaiD, Joanna S. AmbergeriD, Mutaz AminiD, Christina Anne Austin-TseiD, Marie Balzotti, Jonathan S. BergiD, Ewan BirneyiD, Carol A. Bocchini, Elspeth A. BrufordiD, Alison J. CoffeyiD, Heather CollinsiD, Fiona M CunninghamiD, Louise C. DaughertyiD, Yaron Einhorn, Helen V. FirthiD, David R FitzPatrickiD, Rebecca E. FoulgeriD, Jennifer GoldsteiniD, Ada HamoshiD, Matthew E. HurlesiD, Sarah E. A. LeighiD, Ivone Un San LeongiD, , Heidi L. RehmiD
Abstract
PURPOSESeveral groups and resources provide information that pertains to the validity of gene-disease relationships used in genomic medicine and research; however, universal standards and terminologies to define the evidence base for the role of a gene in disease, and a single harmonized resource were lacking. To tackle this issue, the Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC) was formed. METHODSThe GenCC drafted harmonized definitions for differing levels of gene-disease validity based on existing resources, and performed a modified Delphi survey with three rounds to narrow the list of terms. The GenCC also developed a unified database to display curated gene-disease validity assertions from its members. RESULTSBased on 241 survey responses from the genetics community, a consensus term set was chosen for grading gene-disease validity and database submissions. As of December 2021, the database contains 15,241 gene-disease assertions on 4,569 unique genes from 12 submitters. When comparing submissions to the database from distinct sources, conflicts in assertions of gene-disease validity ranged from 5.3% to 13.4%. CONCLUSIONTerminology standardization, sharing of gene-disease validity classifications, and resolution of curation conflicts will facilitate collaborations across international curation efforts and in turn, improve consistency in genetic testing and variant interpretation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 163
- FWCI
- 19.61
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Towards robust clinical genome interpretation: developing a consistent terminology to characterize disease-gene relationships - allelic requirement, inheritance modes and disease mechanisms
Angharad M. Roberts, Marina T. DiStefano, … James S. Ware·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2023
- Evaluating the clinical validity of gene-disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the Clinical Genome Resource
Natasha T. Strande, Erin Rooney Riggs, … Jonathan S. Berg·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 25, 2017
- ClinGen Expert Clinical Validity Curation of 164 Hearing Loss Gene-Disease Pairs
Marina T. DiStefano, Sarah E. Hemphill, … Keijan Zhang·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2019
- Curating genomic disease-gene relationships with Gene2Phenotype
T. Michael Yates, Morad Ansari, … Helen V. Firth·medRxiv·Feb 26, 2024
- The ClinGen Syndromic Disorders Gene Curation Expert Panel: Assessing the Clinical Validity of 111 Gene-Disease Relationships
Eleanor C Broeren, Vanessa N. Gitau, … Alison J. Coffey·Genetics in Medicine OpenPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Gene Portals: A Framework for Integrating Clinical, Functional, and Structural Evidence into Rare Disease Variant Classification
Tobias Brünger, Ilona Krey, … Dennis Lal·medRxiv·Mar 6, 2026