Sign in

Abstract

PURPOSESeveral groups and resources provide information that pertains to the validity of gene-disease relationships used in genomic medicine and research; however, universal standards and terminologies to define the evidence base for the role of a gene in disease, and a single harmonized resource were lacking. To tackle this issue, the Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC) was formed. METHODSThe GenCC drafted harmonized definitions for differing levels of gene-disease validity based on existing resources, and performed a modified Delphi survey with three rounds to narrow the list of terms. The GenCC also developed a unified database to display curated gene-disease validity assertions from its members. RESULTSBased on 241 survey responses from the genetics community, a consensus term set was chosen for grading gene-disease validity and database submissions. As of December 2021, the database contains 15,241 gene-disease assertions on 4,569 unique genes from 12 submitters. When comparing submissions to the database from distinct sources, conflicts in assertions of gene-disease validity ranged from 5.3% to 13.4%. CONCLUSIONTerminology standardization, sharing of gene-disease validity classifications, and resolution of curation conflicts will facilitate collaborations across international curation efforts and in turn, improve consistency in genetic testing and variant interpretation.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
163
FWCI
19.61
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISRoberts '23Strande '17DiStefano '19Yates '24Broeren '25Brünger '26
66% semantic matchGenetic & Genomic Medicine
Angharad M. Roberts, Marina T. DiStefano, Erin Rooney Riggs+23 more·Genetics in Medicine·Nov 17, 2023· 20 citations