Sign in
NeuroscienceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Peer-reviewed journal article

Competitive dynamics underlie cognitive improvements during sleep.

Pin‐Chun CheniD, Hamid NiknazariD, William A. Alaynick, Lauren N. WhitehurstiD, Sara Carole MednickiD

Abstract

We provide evidence that human sleep is a competitive arena where cognitive domains vie for limited resources. Using pharmacology and effective connectivity analysis, we demonstrate that long-term memory and working memory are served by distinct offline neural mechanisms that are mutually antagonistic. Specifically, we administered zolpidem to increase central sigma activity and demonstrated targeted suppression of autonomic vagal activity. With effective connectivity, we determined the central activity has greater causal influence over autonomic activity, and the magnitude of this influence during sleep produced a behavioral trade-off between offline long-term and working memory processing. These findings show the first evidence of a sleep switch mechanism that toggles between central sigma-dependent long-term memory and autonomic vagal-dependent working memory processing. Significant StatementSleep facilitates both long-term episodic memory consolidation and short-term working memory functioning. However, the mechanism by which the sleeping brain performs both complex feats, and which sleep features are associated with these processes remain unclear. Using a pharmacological approach, we demonstrate that long-term and working memory are served by distinct offline neural mechanisms, and that these mechanisms are mutually antagonistic. We propose a Sleep Switch model in which the brain toggles between the two memory processes via a complex interaction at the synaptic, systems, and mechanistic level, with implications for research on cognitive disturbances observed in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimers and Parkinsons disease, both of which involve the decline of sleep.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
21
FWCI
1.18
Field percentile
top 24%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISZhang '24Antony '18Morehouse '25Isotalus '20Harrington '24Denis '25
73% semantic matchNeuroscience
Jing Zhang, Pin‐Chun Chen, Sara Carole Mednick+1 more·bioRxiv·May 14, 2024· 3 citations