henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivPhysiology

The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight

B. R. Aiello, U. B. Sikandar, H. Minoguchi, B. Bhinderwala, C. A. Hamilton, A. Y. Kawahara, S. Sponberg

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Across insects, wing shape and size have undergone dramatic divergence even in closely related sister groups, but we do not yet know morphology changes in tandem with kinematics to support body weight within available aerodynamic power and how the specific force production patterns are linked to changes in behavior. Hawkmoths and wild silkmoths are two such diverse sister families with divergent wing morphology. Using 3d kinematics and quasi-steady aerodynamic modeling, we compare the aerodynamics and the contributions of wing shape, size, and kinematics in 10 moth species. We find that wing movement also diverges between the clades and underlies two distinct strategies for flight. Hawkmoths use wing kinematics, especially high frequencies, to enhance force, but wing morphologies that reduces power. Silkmoths use wing morphology to enhance force, and high amplitude wingstrokes to reduce power. Both strategies converge on similar aerodynamic power and can support similar body mass ranges, but their within-wingstroke force profiles are quite different and linked to the hovering flight of hawkmoths and the bobbing flight of silkmoths. These two groups of moths each fly more like other, distantly related insects than they do each other, demonstrating the convergence and diversity of flapping flight evolution.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSikandar '25Baker '26Roy '25Roy '26Aiello '21Wold '24
81% semantic matchBiophysics
Usama Bin Sikandar, Brett R. Aiello, Simon Sponberg·Journal of The Royal Society Interface·Aug 1, 2025· 3 citations