bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Flight muscle allocation diverges between two moth families with distinct flight strategies
Joanna N. BakeriD, Ethan S. WoldiD, Leo WoodiD, Brett R. AielloiD, Simon SponbergiD
Abstract
An animal's musculature must support its specific biomechanical needs, so muscle morphology and volume allocation may adapt when locomotor strategies diversify. We examined muscle size and morphology in two sister families of bombycoid moths, wild silkmoths (Saturniidae) and hawkmoths (Sphingidae), that have diverged in wingbeat frequency, wing morphology, and behavior. Although both families rely on the same muscles to power and steer flight, they may distribute muscle volume differently to prioritize distinct functions. We hypothesized that flight power muscle proportions are larger in hawkmoths and increase with wingbeat frequency, helping meet inertial power demands of high-frequency maneuverable flight. We also hypothesized that some individual muscles diverge in proportional volume and area to support distinct wing control strategies. To test our hypotheses, we took CT scans of twenty bombycoid species and quantified volumes and geometries of six flight muscle pairs. As expected, flight power muscle proportions positively correlate with wingbeat frequency and are generally greater in hawkmoths. Two of three steering muscles diverge substantially in relative volume and area between families. Most muscles exhibit greater length in silkmoths and greater cross-sectional area in hawkmoths. Finally, the dorsal oblique(DO) muscle diverges exceptionally in size and morphology, being highly developed in hawkmoths and smaller or absent in silkmoths. This unexpected difference supports the DO having an underappreciated role in flight control, possibly via shaping indirect strain propagation in the elastic thorax. We show that muscle volume distribution parallels bombycoids' divergent flight strategies, demonstrating how muscle allocation can adapt for specialized functional goals.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight
B. R. Aiello, U. B. Sikandar, … S. Sponberg·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2020
- Moth resonant mechanics are tuned to wingbeat frequency and energetic demands.
E. Wold, B. Aiello, … S. Sponberg·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2024
- Body oscillations reduce the aerodynamic power requirement of wild silkmoth flight
Usama Bin Sikandar, Brett R. Aiello, Simon Sponberg·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2025
- Adaptive shifts underlie the divergence in wing morphology in bombycoid moths
B. R. Aiello, M. Tan, … S. Sponberg·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2021
- Diptera flight diversity is shaped by aerodynamic constraints, scaling, and evolutionary trade-offs
Camille Le Roy, Ilam Bharathi, … Florian Titus Muijres·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2026
- Flight power muscles have a coordinated, causal role in controlling hawkmoth pitch turns
Leo Wood, Joy Putney, Simon Sponberg·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2024