Breeding with Major and Minor Genes: Genomic Selection for Quantitative Disease Resistance
Lance F. MerrickiD, Adrienne B. Burke, Xianming CheniD, Arron Hyrum CarteriD
Abstract
Most disease resistance in plants is quantitative, with both major and minor genes controlling resistance. This research aimed to optimize genomic selection (GS) models for use in breeding programs needing to select both major and minor genes for resistance. In this experiment, stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis Westend. f. sp. tritici Erikss.) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was used as a model for quantitative disease resistance. The quantitative nature of stripe rust is usually phenotyped with two disease traits, infection type and disease severity. We compared two types of training populations composed of 2,630 breeding lines phenotyped in single plot trials from four years (2016-2020) and 475 diversity panel lines from four years (2013-2016), both across two locations. We also compared the accuracy of models with four different major gene markers and genome-wide association (GWAS) markers as fixed effects. The prediction models used 31,975 markers replicated 50 times using 5-fold cross-validation. We then compared the GS models with marker-assisted selection to compare the prediction accuracy of the markers alone and in combination. The GS models had higher accuracies than marker-assisted selection and reached an accuracy of 0.72 for disease severity. The major gene and GWAS markers had only a small to zero increase in prediction accuracy over the base GS model, with the highest accuracy increase of 0.03 for major markers and 0.06 for GWAS markers. There was a statistical increase in accuracy by using the disease severity trait, the breeding lines, population type, and by combing years. There was also a statistical increase in accuracy using major markers within the validation sets as the mean accuracy decreased. The inclusion of fixed effects in low prediction scenarios increased accuracy up to 0.06 for GS models using significant GWAS markers. Our results indicate that GS can accurately predict quantitative disease resistance in the presence of major and minor genes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 66
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Classification and Regression Models for Genomic Selection of Skewed Phenotypes: A Case for Disease Resistance in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Lance F. Merrick, Dennis N. Lozada, … Arron Hyrum Carter·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 23, 2022
- Selection of trait-specific markers and multi-environment models improve genomic predictive ability in rice
ADITI BHANDARI, Jérôme Bartholomé, … Nourollah Ahmadi·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2019
- Genome Wide Association Study of Resistance to PstS2 and Warrior Races of Stripe (Yellow) Rust in Bread Wheat Landraces.
Muhammad Massub Tehseen, Fatma Aykut Tonk, … K. Nazari·The Plant GenomePeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2020
- Identification of leaf rust resistance loci in a geographically diverse panel of wheat using genome-wide association analysis
- Identification of leaf rust resistance loci in hard winter wheat using genome-wide association mapping
Indira Priyadarshini Lakkakula, JAMES A. KOLMER, … Meriem Aoun·The Plant GenomePeer-reviewed·Jan 5, 2025
- Mapping of Stripe Rust and Leaf Rust Resistance Genes in the Hard Red Winter Wheat Population Green Hammer/Lonerider
Rajat Sharma, Meinan Wang, … Meriem Aoun·bioRxiv·May 15, 2026