Science Translational MedicineCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Comprehensive analysis of microbial content in whole-genome sequencing samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas project
Yuchen GeiD, Jennifer LuiD, Daniela PuiuiD, Mahler RevsineiD, Steven L. SalzbergiD
Abstract
In recent years, a growing number of publications have reported the presence of microbial species in human tumors and of mixtures of microbes that appear to be highly specific to different cancer types. Our recent re-analysis of data from three cancer types revealed that technical errors have caused erroneous reports of numerous microbial species found in sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. Here we have expanded our analysis to cover all 5,734 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data sets currently available from TCGA, covering 25 distinct types of cancer. We analyzed the microbial content using updated computational methods and databases, and compared our results to those from two major recent studies that focused on bacteria, viruses, and fungi in cancer. Our results expand upon and reinforce our recent findings, which showed that the presence of microbes is far smaller than had been previously reported, and that many species identified in TCGA data are either not present at all, or are known contaminants rather than microbes residing within tumors. As part of this expanded analysis, and to help others avoid being misled by flawed data, we have released a dataset that contains detailed read counts for bacteria, viruses, archaea, and fungi detected in all 5,734 TCGA samples, which can serve as a public reference for future investigations. One-sentence summaryAnalysis of microbial content in 5,734 whole-genome sequencing samples from TCGA yields a comprehensive new resource for investigating the role of microbes in cancer.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 60
- FWCI
- 18.35
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Major data analysis errors invalidate cancer microbiome findings
A. Gihawi, Y. Ge, … S. Salzberg·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2023
- Reply to: Caution Regarding the Specificities of Pan-Cancer Microbial Structure
Gregory D. Sepich‐Poore, Evguenia Kopylova, … Rob D. Knight·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2023
- A multi-step filtering pipeline for human read removal enhances detection of Fusobacterium in WGS datasets with immunohistochemical confirmation in mucinous rectal cancer.
Mariia S. Frolova, Barry Maguire, … Jochen H.M. Prehn·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2025
- Revisiting the cancer microbiome using PRISM
Bassel Ghaddar, Martin J. Blaser, Subhajyoti De·Cancer CellPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2026
- A bioinformatics tool for identifying intratumoral microbes from the ORIEN dataset
Cankun Wang, Anjun Ma, … Qin Ma·Cancer Research CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2024
- Characterizing the Cancer-Associated Microbiome with Small RNA Sequencing Data
Wei-Hao Lee, Kai-Pu Chen, … Hsueh‐Fen Juan·Biochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 29, 2019