bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
Analysis and Exploration of the Implementation System of Mixed Ownership of Scientific and Technological Achievements in Colleges and Universities
Abstract
Due to the backwardness of the management model and the rigidity of the system, the current service invention system restricts the transformation of scientific and technological achievements of colleges and universities to a certain extent. The mixed ownership system of university post achievements, which gives universities and inventors the freedom to dispose of the rights of scientific and technological achievements, and fundamentally stimulates the enthusiasm of all the achievement owners to transform their achievements, is an important exploration to promote the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. However, there are still many problems in the implementation of the mixed ownership of scientific and technological achievements in colleges and universities. Through the questionnaire survey and analysis, it is found that the four problems such as defects in the management system for the distribution of rights and interests of scientific and technological achievements, imperfect evaluation indicators of scientific and technological achievements, imbalance in the service system for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and lack of authoritative standards for the evaluation of the value of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements are the main problems hindering the development of mixed ownership of the current college post achievements. Based on the existing problems, it is proposed to continue to improve the management system, assessment system and service system of mixed ownership of scientific and technological achievements in colleges and universities. The research results can provide new evidence and policy enlightenment for the development of mixed ownership of scientific and technological achievements in colleges and universities in China.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) -- A multi-actor qualitative study on success in science
N. Aubert Bonn, W. Pinxten·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2020
- Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (Part 2) -- A multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science
N. Aubert Bonn, W. Pinxten·Research Integrity and Peer ReviewPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2021
- Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers' opinions on success indicators
N. Aubert Bonn, W. Pinxten·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2020
- A survey on information sources used by academic researchers to evaluate scientific instruments
Carsten Bergenholtz, Samuel C. MacAulay, … Inge Seim·bioRxiv·May 3, 2018
- Women's representation in Indian academia and conferences
S. Muralidhar, V. Ananthanarayanan·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2024
- A decade of empirical research on research integrity: what have we (not) looked at?
N. Aubert Bonn, W. Pinxten·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2019