bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint
Quantitative stable isotope probing to measure in situ growth of protist populations
Rebecca L. MauiD, Michaela HayeriD, Paul DijkstraiD, Stefan GeiseniD, Bruce A. HungateiD, Egbert SchwartziD
Abstract
Soil protists shape microbial food webs and nutrient cycling, yet methods for measuring their population growth in soil have lagged behind the taxonomic resolution available from 18S rRNA gene sequencing. Microscopy-based approaches can estimate abundance and growth, but with limited taxonomic resolution. Here, we tested whether quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) can provide reproducible, sequencing-resolved growth measurements for soil protists. We incubated soil with natural-abundance or {superscript 1} O-labeled water and measured taxon-specific 18O enrichment in DNA using three common 18S rRNA gene primer sets. 18O enrichment values were positively correlated across datasets, with relationships closest to 1:1 after poorly resolved taxonomic assignments were excluded, indicating that qSIP provides reproducible population-level growth signals across marker choices. We then compared 18S amplicon profiles from unfractionated DNA with qSIP-derived growth measurements across a soil moisture gradient. Amplicon profiles showed small shifts in relative abundances of major protist groups, whereas qSIP revealed a large moisture response in the growing community: 7 ASVs were growing at 20% field capacity compared with 143 at 80% field capacity, representing 1.6% and 63.3% of total protist relative abundance, respectively. Average growth was <1% day{square}1 in the two driest treatments, increasing to 2.1% day{square}1 at 60% and 5.6% day{square}1 at 80% field capacity; among growing taxa, rates averaged 8.7% and 8.3% day{square}1 in the two wetter treatments. By pairing taxonomic resolution with isotope-based growth estimates, qSIP with 18O-H2O moves soil protist ecology toward quantitative population dynamics: identifying which taxa grow, how fast, and how growth responds to the environment.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Measurement error and resolution in quantitative stable isotope probing: implications for experimental design
E. T. Sieradzki, B. J. Koch, … J. Pett-Ridge·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2020
- Protist quantitative stable isotope probing identifies diverse active grazers in natural freshwater communities
Sofia Papadopoulou, Javier Florenza, … William D. Orsi·bioRxiv·Apr 3, 2026
- Hydrogen stable isotope probing of lipids demonstrates slow rates of microbial growth in soil
T. A. Caro, J. McFarlin, … S. Kopf·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2022
- Quantitative stable-isotope probing (qSIP) with metagenomics links microbial physiology and activity to soil moisture in Mediterranean-climate grassland ecosystems
A. Greenlon, E. T. Sieradzki, … J. F. Banfield·bioRxiv·May 2, 2022
- Internal DNA standards for Isopycnic Centrifugation of Environmental DNA in Quantitative Stable Isotope Probing
Egbert Schwartz, Michaela Hayer, … Jennifer Pett-Ridge·Journal of Microbiological MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2026
- Ultra-sensitive Protein-SIP to quantify activity and substrate uptake in microbiomes with stable isotopes
M. Kleiner, A. Kouris, … M. Strous·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2021