bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
NRGRank: Coarse-grained structurally-informed ultra-massive virtual screening
Thomas DesCôteauxiD, Olivier MailhotiD, Rafaël NajmanovichiD
Abstract
NRGRank is a coarse-grained structurally-informed virtual screening Python package with accuracy comparable to docking-based methodologies but up to 100-fold speed increase. NRGRank is based on a coarse-grained evaluation of pairwise atom-type pseudo-energy interactions that implicitly accounts for compound and side-chain flexibility as well as limited backbone movements. We compare NRGRank to docking-based virtual screening software Glide, Autodock Vina and DOCK 3.7 on the DUD-E virtual screening benchmark using enrichment factors at 1% (EF1). We observe broad variations of EF1 values across targets, structural models and methods. For apo form or AlphaFold2 models, out of a subset of 37 targets from DUD-E, NRGRank has better EF1 values than Glide for 12 and 13 targets respectively. Even in holo form, where the accuracy of classical docking software increases, NRGRank has better EF1 values than 13, 10 and 5 targets out of 37 compared to AutoDock Vina, DOCK 3.7 and Glide respectively. Comparing the rank of true binders in Glide and NRGRank shows that true binders ranked in the top 1% are complementary between methods irrespective of the target form (AlphaFold, apo or holo). That is, utilizing NRGRank detects binders that are missed by Glide (and presumably other methods), whereas those found by Glide are missed by NRGRank. Furthermore, we observe that most hits found by NRGRank within the top 50 predictions (4.38 {+/-} 5.49 hits on average for AF2 targets) remain once the top 1% of predictions are re-scored with Glide, but the hit rate within the top 50 predictions increases. NRGRank can evaluate one molecule in 0.3 s on average, enabling a modern laptop with 8 cores to screen 1,000,000 molecules in 24 hours - up to two orders of magnitude faster than the reported speed of DOCK 3.7, AutoDock Vina running on GPUs and Glide. NRGRank occupies a unique niche among tools for virtual screening being insensitive to structural inaccuracies but with comparable accuracy as state-of-the-art docking methods and fast as AI-based methods but without the dangers of overfitting as it is based on 780 pseudo-energy parameters. Combined with the fact that NRGRank does not require extensive or expensive computational resources or expert pre-processing of targets, it is unique in making high-performance ultra-massive virtual screening accessible to all.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rank-Resolved Multi-Engine Docking and Optuna-Optimized Re-Ranking with ProDock for Virtual Screening
Hoang-Son Lai Le, Thanh-An Pham, … Tuyen Ngoc Truong·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2026
- Structure-guided compound prioritization strategy for virtual screening identifies putative binders for the nuclear receptor LRH-1
Ana Cristina Chang-Gonzalez, Alexis N. Campbell, … Jens Meiler·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2026
- Comparative study of protein X-ray and NMR structures: molecular docking-based virtual screening
Srdan Masirevic, Hao Fan·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2025
- NRGSuite-Qt: A PyMOL plugin for high-throughput virtual screening, molecular docking, normal-mode analysis, the study of molecular interactions and the detection of binding-site similarities
Gabriel Tiago Galdino, Thomas DesCôteaux, … Rafaël Najmanovich·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Dec 26, 2024
- NeuralDock: Rapid and conformation-agnostic docking of small molecules
C. M. Sha, J. Wang, N. V. Dokholyan·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2021
- G-screen: Scalable Protein-Aware Virtual Screening through Flexible Ligand Alignment
Nuri Jung, Hahnbeom Park, … Chaok Seok·Journal of CheminformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2026