bioRxivSystems BiologyPreprint
Spectral fingerprints distinguish buckling from angiogenesis in tortuous blood vessels
Abstract
HighlightsO_LIBuckling and angiogenesis yield distinct vessel power spectra C_LIO_LIDominant buckling wavelength vs k-2 angiogenic scaling C_LIO_LITwo-phase CA+EB model matches real retinal vessel morphology C_LIO_LIOCTA500 segments show morphology beyond single-mechanism models C_LI Physiological blood vessels are generally straight, but tortuous curvature is observed under pathological conditions across spatial scales, from large arteries to retinal microvasculature and tumor-associated vessels. Here, we compare two theoretical mechanisms of curved vessel formation--mechanical buckling and angiogenic biased random walk--by analyzing the vessel centerline height function in Fourier space. We simplify the Chaplain-Anderson angiogenesis model and an Euler-Bernoulli buckling model with surrounding-tissue support, reproduce curvature numerically, and analyze the power spectra of the resulting patterns. Buckling yields a single characteristic peak in the power spectrum, whereas angiogenesis yields k-2 scaling in the low-frequency range. Mathematical analysis explains the selective growth of a dominant buckling wavelength in the buckling model and the origin of the scaling in the Chaplain-Anderson model. We further analyze OCTA500 segments using morphological descriptors (power spectrum, autocorrelation, and mean squared displacement); neither single-mechanism prediction alone accounts for the observed morphology, motivating a two-phase model in which angiogenic structure generation is followed by mechanical remodeling. Based on this two-phase hypothesis (a Chaplain-Anderson (CA)-like scaling background plus mechanical remodeling), we introduce quantitative indices--residual low-to-high wavenumber power ratio (rLHP) and slope reversal density (SRD)--to quantify Euler-Bernoulli-like buckling contributions in vessel segments. These results suggest that spectral fingerprints and complementary metrics may help distinguish mechanically driven tortuosity from angiogenesis-driven tortuosity in vascular images.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Numerical evaluation reveals the effect of branching morphology on vessel transport properties during angiogenesis
Fatemeh Mirzapourshafiyi, Yukinori Kametani, … Masanori Nakayama·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 16, 2021
- Growth-driven mechanical buckling as a mechanism of age-related tortuosity in human cerebral arteries
Tomoaki Akiyama, Koji Yoshimoto, Takashi Miura·bioRxiv·Nov 5, 2026
- Complex relationship among vessel diameter, shear stress and blood pressure controlling vessel pruning during angiogenesis
Vivek Kumar, Prashant Kumar, … Yosuke Hasegawa·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2026
- Competing Fluid Forces Control Endothelial Sprouting in a 3-D Microfluidic Vessel Bifurcation Model
E. Akbari, G. B. Spychalski, … J. W. Song·bioRxiv·May 3, 2019
- Remodeling mechanisms determine size distributions in developing retinal vasculature
Osamu Iizuka, Shotaro Kawamura, … Takashi Miura·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2020
- Topological evolution of sprouting vascular networks: from day-by-day analysis to general growth rules.
K. O. Rojek, A. Wrzos, … J. Guzowski·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2023