bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Safety Recommendations for Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Brain
Antonino Mario CassaraiD, Taylor NewtoniD, Katie ZhuangiD, Sabine J. Regel, Peter AchermanniD, Niels KusteriD, Esra NeufeldiD
Abstract
Temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is a new form of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) that has been proposed as a method for targeted, non-invasive stimulation of deep brain structures. While TIS holds promise for a variety of clinical and non-clinical applications, little data is yet available regarding its effects in humans. To inform the design and approval of experiments involving TIS, researchers require quantitative guidance regarding exposure limits and other safety concerns. To this end, we sought to delineate a safe range of exposure parameters (voltages and currents applied via external scalp electrodes) for TIS in humans through comparisons with well-established but related brain stimulation modalities. Specifically, we surveyed the literature for adverse events (AEs) associated with transcranial alternating/direct current stimulation (tACS/tDCS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and TIS to establish known boundaries for safe operating conditions. Drawing on the biophysical mechanisms associated with the identified AEs, we determined appropriate exposure metrics for each stimulation modality. Using these metrics, we conducted an in silico comparison of various exposure scenarios for tACS, DBS, and TIS using multiphysics simulations in an anatomically detailed head model with realistic current strengths. By matching stimulation scenarios in terms of biophysical impact, we inferred the frequency-dependent TIS stimulation parameters that resulted in exposure magnitudes known to be safe for tACS and DBS. Based on the results of our simulations and existing knowledge regarding tES and DBS safety, we propose frequency-dependent thresholds below which TIS voltages and currents are unlikely to pose a risk to humans. Safety-related data from ongoing and future human studies are required to verify and refine the thresholds proposed here.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: simulation
- Citations
- 12
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Prospects for transcranial temporal interference stimulation in humans: a computational study
S. Rampersad, B. Roig-Solvas, … D. H. Brooks·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2019
- Responses of Model Cortical Neurons to Temporal Interference Stimulation and Related Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modalities
B. Wang, A. S. Aberra, … A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·May 4, 2022
- Safety of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Patients with Implants: A Computational Study
Fariba Karimi, Antonino M. Cassarà, … Esra Neufeld·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2024
- Characterizing Low-Frequency Artifacts During Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIS)
Jill von Conta, Florian H. Kasten, … Christoph Siegfried Herrmann·Neuroimage ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2022
- Temporal interference electrical neurostimulation yields fMRI BOLD activation in humans
Priyamvada Modak, Justin M. Fine, … Joshua W. Brown·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2024
- Mimicking and mitigating the cutaneous response to transcranial electrical stimulation using interferential and combinatorial techniques
B. Howell, C. C. McIntyre·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2021