BMC BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluation of Vicinity-based Hidden Markov Models for Genotype Imputation
Su WangiD, Miran KimiD, Xiaoqian JiangiD, Arif O. HarmanciiD
Abstract
The decreasing cost of DNA sequencing has led to a great increase in our knowledge about genetic variation. While population-scale projects bring important insight into genotype-phenotype relationships, the cost of performing whole-genome sequencing on large samples is still prohibitive. In-silico genotype imputation coupled with genotyping-by-arrays is a cost-effective and accurate alternative for genotyping of common and uncommon variants. Imputation methods compare the genotypes of the typed variants with the large population-specific reference panels and estimate the genotypes of untyped variants by making use of the linkage disequilibrium patterns. Most accurate imputation methods are based on the Li-Stephens hidden Markov model, HMM, that treats the sequence of each chromosome as a mosaic of the haplotypes from the reference panel. Here we assess the accuracy of local-HMMs, where each untyped variant is imputed using the typed variants in a small window around itself (as small as 1 centimorgan). Locality-based imputation is used recently by machine learning-based genotype imputation approaches. We assess how the parameters of the local-HMMs impact the imputation accuracy in a comprehensive set of benchmarks and show that local-HMMs can accurately impute common and uncommon variants and can be relaxed to impute rare variants as well. The source code for the local HMM implementations is publicly available at https://github.com/harmancilab/LoHaMMer.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: imputation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- approach: Bayesian inference
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Field percentile
- top 42%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Why are rare variants hard to impute? Coalescent models reveal theoretical limits in existing algorithms.
Yichen Si, Brett R. Vanderwerff, Sebastian K. Zöllner·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2021
- Using population-specific add-on polymorphisms to improve genotype imputation in underrepresented populations
Zhi Ming Xu, Sina Rüeger, … Jacques Fellay·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2022
- Rapid, Reference-Free Human Genotype Imputation with Denoising Autoencoders
Raquel Dias, Doug Evans, … Ali Torkamani·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2022
- A Recurrent Neural Network Based Method for Genotype Imputation on Phased Genotype Data
Kaname Kojima, Shu Tadaka, … Kengo Kinoshita·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2019
- A Fast Data-Driven Method for Genotype Imputation, Phasing, and Local Ancestry Inference: MendelImpute.jl
Benjamin B. Chu, Eric M. Sobel, … Kenneth L. Lange·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2021
- A comparative analysis of current phasing and imputation software
Adriano De Marino, Abdallah Amr Mahmoud, … Puya G. Yazdi·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 19, 2022