bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Bayesian priors for tree calibration: Evaluating two new approaches based on fossil intervals
Ryan W. Norris, Cory L. Strope, David M. McCandlishiD, Arlin StoltzfusiD
Abstract
BackgroundStudies of diversification and trait evolution increasingly rely on combining molecular sequences and fossil dates to infer time-calibrated phylogenetic trees. Available calibration software provides many options for the shape of the prior probability distribution of ages at a node to be calibrated, but the question of how to assign a Bayesian prior from limited fossil data remains open.\n\nResultsWe introduce two new methods for generating priors based upon (1) the interval between the two oldest fossils in a clade, i.e., the penultimate gap (PenG), and (2) the ghost lineage length (GLin), defined as the difference between the oldest fossils for each of two sister lineages. We show that PenG and GLin/2 are point estimates of the interval between the oldest fossil and the true age for the node. Furthermore, given either of these quantities, we derive a principled prior distribution for the true age. This prior is log-logistic, and can be implemented approximately in existing software. Using simulated data, we test these new methods against some other approaches.\n\nConclusionsWhen implemented as approaches for assigning Bayesian priors, the PenG and GLin methods increase the accuracy of inferred divergence times, showing considerably more precision than the other methods tested, without significantly greater bias. When implemented as approaches to post-hoc scaling of a tree by linear regression, the PenG and GLin methods exhibit less bias than other methods tested. The new methods are simple to use and can be applied to a variety of studies that call for calibrated trees.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Data-driven speciation tree prior for better species divergence times in calibration-poor molecular phylogenies
Q. Tao, J. Barba-Montoya, S. Kumar·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2021
- Ignoring fossil age uncertainty leads to inaccurate topology and divergence times in time calibrated tree inference
J. Barido-Sottani, N. van Tiel, … R. C. Warnock·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2020
- The Past Sure Is Tense: On Interpreting Phylogenetic Divergence Time Estimates
J. W. Brown, S. A. Smith·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2017
- Estimating diversification rates from the fossil record
Gilles Didier, Marine Fau, Michel Laurin·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2015
- The Trials and Tribulations of Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of Divergence Analyses: the Age of Butterflies Revisited
N. Chazot, N. Wahlberg, … M. Heikkila·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2018
- Diversification models conflate likelihood and prior, and cannot be compared using conventional model-comparison tools
M. R. May, C. Rothfels·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2021