Motivationally objective versus subjective decision-making: Neural correlates, behavior, and self-report

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the neural and behavioral basis of motivationally objective versus subjective value-based decisions. Using a within-subject fMRI design, healthy participants performed a risky decision-making task that elicited different levels of subjectivity in decision-making in two task conditions. In the Best or objective condition, choices were rewarded only when they were objectively best on a given trial, incentivizing decisions based on externally specified per-trial point maximization. In the Choice or subjective condition, participants received the reward associated with the chosen option, irrespective of how it compared to the unchosen option, allowing greater freedom to exercise subjective preferences in decision policy. Behaviorally, participants relied more on objectively optimal policy in the Best than the Choice condition. There was also a greater consensus across participants in behaviorally displayed and self-reported policies in the Best condition as well as a greater commitment to a single policy by individual participants in this condition, further confirming more objective behavior in the Best condition, compared to Choice. Moreover, behavioral inferences showed a greater agreement with self-report in the Best condition. Our fMRI results showed that the decision-making in Choice, relative to the Best condition, was associated with greater BOLD response in mid-cingulum/posterior cingulate cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, suggesting their involvement in less externally constrained, or motivationally subjective, decision-making.