Motor response vigour and fixations reflect subjective preferences during intertemporal choice
Abstract
Value-based decision-making is of central interest in cognitive neuroscience and psychology, as well as in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders characterised by decision-making impairments. Studies examining (neuro-)computational mechanisms underlying choice behaviour typically focus on participants decisions. However, there is increasing evidence that option valuation might also be reflected in motor response vigour and eye movements, implicit measures of subjective utility. To examine motor response vigour and visual fixation correlates of option valuation in intertemporal choice, we set up a task where the participants selected an option by pressing a grip force transducer, simultaneously tracking fixation shifts between options. As outlined in our preregistration (https://osf.io/k6jct), we used hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation to model the choices assuming hyperbolic discounting, compared variants of the softmax and drift diffusion model, and assessed the relationship between response vigour and the estimated model parameters. The behavioural data were best explained by a drift diffusion model specifying a non-linear scaling of the drift rate by the subjective value differences. Replicating previous findings (Green et al., 1997; Wagner et al., 2020), we found a magnitude effect for temporal discounting, such that higher rewards were discounted less. This magnitude effect was further reflected in response vigour, such that stronger forces were exerted in the high vs. the low magnitude condition. Bayesian hierarchical linear regression further revealed higher grip forces, faster response times and a lower number of fixation shifts for trials with higher subjective value differences. Our data suggest that subjective utility or implicit valuation is reflected in response vigour during intertemporal choice. Taking into account response vigour might thus provide deeper insight into decision-making, reward valuation and maladaptive changes in these processes, e.g. in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Field percentile
- top 27%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Saccade vigor partly reflects the subjective economic value of the visual stimulus
Tehrim Yoon, Afareen Jaleel, … Reza Shadmehr·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2020
- Midfrontal theta and pupil dilation parametrically track subjective conflict (but also surprise) during intertemporal choice
Hause Lin, Blair Saunders, … Michael Inzlicht·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2017
- Motivationally objective versus subjective decision-making: Neural correlates, behavior, and self-report
Priyamvada Modak, Joshua W. Brown·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2026
- The vigor paradox: saccade velocity during deliberation encodes utility of effortful actions
Colin C. Korbisch, Daniel R. Apuan, … Alaa A. Ahmed·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2022
- The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: a case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.
Jan Peters, Mark D’Esposito·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2020
- Subjectivity of time perception alters choice preference for future rewards through fronto-striatal value signal dynamics
Reiko Shintaki, Daiki Tanaka, … Koji Jimura·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2022