bioRxivSystems BiologyPreprint
Challenges and Opportunities in Single-Sample Network Modeling
Marieke L. KuijjeriD, Margherita De MarzioiD, Kimberly GlassiD
Abstract
1Analysis of biological networks can provide unprecedented insights into the mechanisms underlying disease. Although many methods have been developed to estimate biological networks, these approaches typically use multiple experimental samples to estimate a single aggregate network, which fails to capture population-level heterogeneity. Recently, several methods have been developed that overcome this limitation by inferring networks for individual samples, i.e. single-sample networks. However, each approach for inferring single-sample networks has been formulated differently, making it challenging to compare them. To address this issue, we re-cast the mathematics of several single-sample network methods using common variables. We then systematically explore the parameters, caveats, and underlying assumptions made by each method and examine how these differences impact single-sample network prediction. Our analyses point to a critical trade-off that occurs when trying to simultaneously predict network edges that are both shared across samples as well as edges that are specific to a given sample. For example, the mathematics of both SWEET and BONOBO includes a scale factor that drives the weights of edges in the predicted single-sample networks toward a background network. The result is that, although networks predicted by these methods tend to have the highest accuracy, this often comes at the cost of very low specificity, an important caveat since the primary goal of sample-specific network modeling is to obtain networks that are specific to each input sample. In contrast, SSN estimates the most specific but least accurate networks, while LIONESS straddles these domains, with an accuracy almost as high as SWEET and BONOBO and a specificity almost as high as SSN. Overall, our analyses highlight some of the broader challenges in this emerging field. However, they also point to important methodological synergies, providing an opportunity to create a common framework that can be used to improve single-sample network inference.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reconstructing Sample-Specific Networks using LIONESS
Marieke L. Kuijjer, Kimberly Glass·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2021
- Evaluation of single-sample network inference methods for precision oncology
Joke Deschildre, Boris Vandemoortele, … Vanessa Vermeirssen·npj Systems Biology and ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2024
- Weak interactions cause poor performance of common network inference models
D. Sadykova, J. M. Yearsley, … P. Caplat·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2023
- Multi-Model and Network Inference Based on Ensemble Estimates: Avoiding the Madness of Crowds
Michael P. H. Stumpf·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2020
- BISoN: A Bayesian Framework for Inference of Social Networks
J. D. A. Hart, M. N. Weiss, … L. J. N. Brent·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2021
- Revealing biases in the sampling of ecological interaction networks
M. de Aguiar, E. A. Newman, … Ecological Network Dynamics Working Group at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological·bioRxiv·May 22, 2018