Detecting rare copy number variants (CNVs) from Illumina genotyping arrays with the CamCNV pipeline: segmentation of z-scores improves detection and reliability.
Joe DennisiD, Logan C. WalkeriD, Jonathan P. TyreriD, Kyriaki MichailidouiD, Douglas F. EastoniD
Abstract
BackgroundThe intensities from genotyping array data can be used to detect CNVs but a high level of noise in the data and overlap between different copy-number intensity distributions produces unreliable calls, particularly when only a few probes are covered by the CNV. ResultsWe present a novel pipeline (CamCNV) with a series of steps to reduce noise and detect more reliably rare CNVs covering as few as three probes. The method uses the information from all samples to convert intensities to z-scores, thus adjusting for variance between probes. We tested the sensitivity of our pipeline by looking for known CNVs from the 1000 Genomes project in our genotyping of 1000 Genomes samples. We also compared the CNV calls for 1,661 pairs of genotyped replicate samples. At the chosen mean z-score cut-off, sensitivity to detect the 1000 Genomes CNVs was approximately 85% for deletions and 65% for duplications. From the replicates we estimate the false discovery rate is controlled at [~]10% for deletions (falling to below 3% with more than five probes) and [~]28% for duplications. The pipeline demonstrates improved sensitivity when compared to calling with PennCNV, particularly for short deletions covering only a few probes ConclusionThe CamCNV pipeline provides a reliable method of detecting rare CNVs from Illumina array data and can be used for CNVs that only cover a few probes. For each called CNV the mean z-score is a useful metric for controlling the false discovery rate.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Field percentile
- top 23%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CNValidatron: Accurate And Efficient Validation of PennCNV Calls Using Computer Vision
Simone Montalbano, G. Bragi Walters, … Andrés Ingason·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2026
- Algorithmic improvements for discovery of germline copy number variants in next-generation sequencing data
Brendan D. O’Fallon, Jacob Durtschi, … Hunter D. Best·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2022
- CNV-PG: a machine-learning framework for accurate copy number variation predicting and genotyping
Taifu Wang, Jinghua Sun, … Qing Zhou·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2020
- Integrative DNA copy number detection and genotyping from sequencing and array-based platforms
Zilu Zhou, Weixin Wang, … Nancy Ruonan Zhang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2018
- JAX-CNV: A whole genome sequencing-based algorithm for copy number detection at clinical grade level
Wan‐Ping Lee, Qihui Zhu, … Chengsheng Zhang·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 24, 2022
- MarkerMatch: A Proximity-Based Probe-Matching Algorithm for Joint Analysis of Copy-Number Variants from Different Genotyping Arrays
Franjo Ivankovic, Dongmei Yu, … Carol A. Mathews·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 22, 2026