Adaptive Strategies of the invasive aquatic plant, Ludwigia grandiflora subps. hexapetala: Contrasting Plasticity Between Aquatic and Terrestrial Morphotypes.
Julien Genitoni, Danièle Vassaux, David RenaultiD, Stéphane MauryiD, Dominique BarloyiD
Abstract
Biological invasion is the fifth biggest threat to biodiversity and ecosystem processes. Invasive species are able to colonise new environments rapidly due to their phenotypic plasticity. Ludwigia grandiflora subsp. hexapetala (Lgh), an aquatic invasive plant, invades various aquatic habitats, such as rivers, ponds, and more recently, especially in France, wet meadows. More recently, a terrestrial morphotype, emergent for half the year, has been identified. The behaviour of aquatic and terrestrial morphotypes in aquatic and terrestrial conditions was analysed through observations of morphological traits, and assays of metabolomics and phytohormones 14 and 28 days after the beginning of the experiment. The phenotypic plasticity was evaluated by calculating the relative distance plasticity index (RDPI) in response to environmental changes (terrestrial versus aquatic). RDPI were measured for morphological traits, metabolic and phytohormonal contents. Our results revealed that the terrestrial morphotype showed higher morphological trait values than the aquatic morphotype, independently of conditions, suggesting a pre-adaptation of Lgh to terrestrial habitats. The aquatic and terrestrial conditions shaped the Lgh metabolomic responses. However, the aquatic morphotype displayed higher phenotypic plasticity indexes than the terrestrial one. In addition, plasticity indexes evolved during the acclimatisation process, leading to increased RPDI values in most cases. The two morphotypes present distinct responses to aquatic and terrestrial conditions (especially in aquatic conditions for the terrestrial morphotype), highlighting the capacity of Lgh for invading new habitats due to its phenotypic plasticity, and a potential local adaptation. This study contributed to the understanding of how invasive species mobilise their phenotypic plasticity in new habitats, and the time required for local adaptation to occur.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Aspects of invasiveness of Ludwigia and Nelumbo in shallow temperate fluvial lakes
V. R. Toth, P. Villa, … M. Bresciani·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2018
- Self-incompatibility limits sexual reproduction rather than environmental conditions in an invasive aquatic plant
L. O. Portillo Lemus, M. Bozec, … D. Barloy·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2020
- Late-acting self-incompatible system, preferential allogamy and delayed selfing in the heteromorphic invasive populations of Ludwigia grandiflora subsp. hexapetala
L. O. Portillo Lemus, M. Harang, … D. Barloy·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2022
- Effects of species traits and abiotic factors during the stages of plant invasions
D. Vedder, L. Leidinger, J. Sarmento Cabral·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2020
- Local differentiation in the defensive morphology of an invasive zooplankton species is not genetically based
G. E. Fiorino, A. G. McAdam·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2017
- Phenotypic plasticity of invasive knotweed across Europe: a distributed common garden experiment
Ramona-Elena Irimia, Madalin Parepa, … Oliver Bossdorf·Journal of EcologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026