bioRxivPlant Biology
Comparative analysis of perennial and annual Phaseolus seed nutrient concentrations
H. E. Schier, K. A. Eliot, S. A. Herron, L. K. Landfried, Z. Migicovsky, M. J. Rubin, A. J. Miller
Abstract
Malnutrition is a global public health concern and identifying mechanisms to elevate the nutrient output of crops may minimize nutrient deficiencies. Perennial grains within an agroforestry context offers one solution. The development and integration of perennial crops for food has critically influenced dialogue on the ecological intensification of agriculture and agroforestry. However, the nutrient compositions of wild, perennial, herbaceous species, such as those related to the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) are not well known. In this study, seed amino acid and ion concentrations of perennial and annual Phaseolus species were quantified using ionomics and mass spectrometry. No statistical difference was observed for Zn, toxic ions (e.g. As) or essential amino acid concentrations (except threonine) between perennial and annual Phaseolus species. However, differences were observed for some nutritionally important ions among and within lifespan groups. Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, and P concentrations were higher in annual species. Intraspecific variability in ion concentrations and amino acids was observed within species; further, ion concentrations and amino acids differ among annual species and among perennial species. Ion and amino acid concentration appear to be largely independent of each other. These results suggest variability in ion and amino acid concentrations exist in nature. As new crop candidates are considered for ecological services, nutritional quality should be optimized to maximize nutrient output of sustainable food crops.
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genotypic and environmental effects on seed coat patterning and nutritional composition in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Tayah M. Bolt, Austin Cole, … Christine Diepenbrock·Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2026
- Contrasting Rhizosphere Nitrogen Dynamics in Andropogoneae Grasses: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture
Sheng‐Kai Hsu, Bryan D. Emmett, … Edward S. Buckler·The Plant JournalPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- PNuts: Global spatio-temporal database of plant nutritional properties
F. Berzaghi, F. Bretagnolle, … A. Ben Abdallah·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2022
- Comparative analysis of seed size, germination, and vegetative allocation in annual and herbaceous perennial crops and their wild relatives in Lupinus and Phaseolus (Fabaceae)
S. A. Herron, M. J. Rubin, … A. J. Miller·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2019
- Effect of Organic and Chemical Fertilizers on the Nutritional Composition of Amaranthus spinosus
D. Raman, N. Joshi, P. S. Rana·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2022
- Quantitative proteomic analysis of soil-grown Brassica napus responses to nutrient deficiency
Lauren E. Grubb, Sabine Scandola, … R. Glen Uhrig·Plant Cell & EnvironmentPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2024