Reverse-complement parameter sharing improves deep learning models for genomics
Avanti ShrikumariD, Peyton Greenside, Anshul Bharat KundajeiD
Abstract
Deep learning approaches that have produced breakthrough predictive models in computer vision, speech recognition and machine translation are now being successfully applied to problems in regulatory genomics. However, deep learning architectures used thus far in genomics are often directly ported from computer vision and natural language processing applications with few, if any, domain-specific modifications. In double-stranded DNA, the same pattern may appear identically on one strand and its reverse complement due to complementary base pairing. Here, we show that conventional deep learning models that do not explicitly model this property can produce substantially different predictions on forward and reverse-complement versions of the same DNA sequence. We present four new convolutional neural network layers that leverage the reverse-complement property of genomic DNA sequence by sharing parameters between forward and reverse-complement representations in the model. These layers guarantee that forward and reverse-complement sequences produce identical predictions within numerical precision. Using experiments on simulated and in vivo transcription factor binding data, we show that our proposed architectures lead to improved performance, faster learning and cleaner internal representations compared to conventional architectures trained on the same data.\n\nAvailabilityOur implementation is available at\n\nContactavanti@stanford.edu, pgreens@stanford.edu, akundaje@stanford.edu
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 68
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Abstract summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract
Standard genomic CNNs can score a sequence and its reverse complement differently; four weight-sharing layer types remove that inconsistency and are reported to train faster.
Deep learning architectures for regulatory genomics are largely taken over from vision and language work with little domain-specific change, even though a motif can sit on either DNA strand. Building the reverse-complement symmetry into the layers makes strand-matched predictions identical by construction instead of leaving them to the training data.
Key results
SuggestedConventional convolutional networks trained on DNA sequence can return substantially different scores for a sequence and its reverse complement.
Reported as an observation on trained models; the abstract gives no discrepancy magnitude, model list or dataset on which it was measured. · Abstract
ClaimedFour new convolutional layer types tie parameters between forward and reverse-complement representations, so the two orientations of a sequence are guaranteed to give the same prediction up to numerical precision.
Stated as a property of the layer construction rather than an empirical measurement; no proof or numerical check is included in the abstract. · Abstract
SuggestedOn simulated and in vivo transcription factor binding data, the parameter-sharing architectures are reported to predict better, learn faster and yield cleaner internal representations than conventional architectures on the same data.
Three qualitative comparisons against conventional architectures trained on identical data; the abstract reports no accuracy metric, training-time figure or representation score. · Abstract
Methods, data and reproducibility
Four convolutional neural network layer types that share parameters between the forward and reverse-complement representations of an input DNA sequence, compared with conventional architectures trained on the same simulated and in vivo transcription factor binding data.
- Simulated DNA sequence data for transcription factor binding prediction
- In vivo transcription factor binding data
- Reproducibility gaps
- An availability statement for the implementation is present, but no URL appears in the text, so the code location cannot be recorded.
Limitations (2)
- Every improvement claim is qualitative: no metric, baseline value, dataset count or training-time measurement is given, so the size of the gain over conventional architectures cannot be judged. · noted in this summary
- Evaluation is confined to transcription factor binding prediction on simulated and in vivo data; no other regulatory genomics task, organism or data type is reported. · noted in this summary
Who should read:Read this if you train convolutional networks on DNA sequence and need a sequence and its reverse complement to receive the same prediction.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Towards a Better Understanding of Reverse-Complement Equivariance for Deep Learning Models in Regulatory Genomics
Hannah Zhou, Avanti Shrikumar, Anshul Bharat Kundaje·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2020
- Reverse-Complement Equivariant Networks for DNA Sequences
Vincent Mallet, Jean‐Philippe Vert·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2021
- Separable Fully Connected Layers Improve Deep Learning Models For Genomics
Amr M. Alexandari, Avanti Shrikumar, Anshul Bharat Kundaje·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2017
- Janggu: Deep Learning for Genomics
Wolfgang Kopp, Remo Monti, … Altuna Akalin·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2020
- GENA-LM: A Family of Open-Source Foundational DNA Language Models for Long Sequences
Veniamin Fishman, Yuri Kuratov, … Mikhail Burtsev·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 26, 2024
- Contrastive pre-training for sequence based genomics models
Ksenia Sokolova, Kathleen Chen, Olga G. Troyanskaya·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2024