The American Journal of Human GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Multiple-testing corrections in selection scans using identity-by-descent segments
Abstract
Failing to correct for multiple testing in selection scans can lead to false discoveries of recent genetic adaptations. The scanning statistics in selection studies are often too complicated to theoretically derive a genome-wide significance level or empirically validate control of the family-wise error rate (FWER). By modeling the autocorrelation of identity-by-descent (IBD) rates, we propose a computationally efficient method to determine genome-wide significance levels in an IBD-based scan for recent positive selection. In whole genome simulations, we show that our method has approximate control of the FWER and can adapt to the spacing of tests along the genome. We also show that these scans can have more than fifty percent power to reject the null model in hard sweeps with a selection coefficient s >= 0.01 and a sweeping allele frequency between twenty-five and seventy-five percent. A few human genes and gene complexes have statistically significant excesses of IBD segments in thousands of samples of African, European, and South Asian ancestry groups from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine project and the United Kingdom Biobank. Among the significant loci, many signals of recent selection are shared across ancestry groups. One shared selection signal at a skeletal cell development gene is extremely strong in African ancestry samples. HighlightsO_LIWe propose a method to address multiple testing when scanning along the genome for excess identity-by-descent rates. C_LIO_LIIn whole genome simulations, we calculate that the family-wise error rates of our method are close to the desired family-wise significance level. C_LIO_LIWe perform six selection scans in two consortium datasets covering different ancestry groups and reference genome builds. C_LIO_LIFor a genomic region on chromosome 16, we report extremely high identity-by-descent rates in African ancestry groups and replication in European and South Asian ancestry groups. C_LI
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modeling recent positive selection in Americans of European ancestry
Seth D Temple, Ryan K. Waples, Sharon R. Browning·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2023
- Multiple-testing corrections in case-control studies using identity-by-descent segments
Seth D Temple, Nicola H. Chapman, … Elizabeth Blue·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2026
- Patterns of shared signatures of recent positive selection across human populations
Kelsey E. Johnson, Benjamin F. Voight·Nature Ecology & EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Feb 16, 2018
- Understanding natural selection in Holocene Europe using multi-locus genotype identity scans
Devansh Pandey, Mariana Harris, … Vagheesh M. Narasimhan·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2023
- Probabilistic estimation of identity by descent segment endpoints and detection of recent selection
Sharon R. Browning, Brian L. Browning·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 13, 2020
- Ohana: detecting selection in multiple populations by modelling ancestral admixture components
Jade Yu Cheng, Aaron J. Stern, … Rasmus Nielsen·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2021