henhaobio
Sign in

Royal Society Open ScienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Downward Gazing for Steadiness

Yogev KoreniD, Rotem MaironiD, Ilay Sofer, Yisrael ParmetiD, Ohad Ben‐ShahariD, Simona Bar‐HaimiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

When walking on an uneven surface or complex terrain, humans tend to gaze downward. Previous investigations indicate that visual information can be used for online control of stepping. Behavioral investigations suggest that, during walking, the availability of visual information increases stepping accuracy, but probably through a feedforward control mechanism. Consequently, downward gazing (DWG) is usually interpreted as a strategy used to acquire useful information for online and/or feedforward control of stepping. Visual information is not exclusively used for guiding locomotion; a wealth of literature has been published on the usefulness of visual information for feedback postural control. Critically, postural control has been shown to be sensitive to the visual flow arising from the respective motion of the individual and the 3D environment. To investigate whether DWG can be used to enhance feedback control of posture, rather than feedforward/online control of gait, we conducted a series of experiments that explore this possible interplay. Through these experiments we were able to show that DWG, just a few steps ahead, results in a steadier standing and walking posture, without the need for accuracy. Moreover, we were able to demonstrate that humans resort to DWG when walking stability is compromised, even when destabilizing features were visually unpredictable. This series of experiments provides sufficient evidence of the possible interplay between visual information used for guiding locomotion and that used for postural control. Moreover, this evidence raises concerns regarding the way we interpret gaze behavior without the knowledge of the type and use of the information gathered.

Citations
10
FWCI
1.83
Field percentile
top 16%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMatthis '22Powell '26Render '26Render '26Dieën '24Reimann '24
69% semantic matchNeuroscience
Jonathan Samir Matthis, Karl Muller, Kathryn Bonnen+1 more·PLoS Computational Biology·Feb 22, 2022· 111 citations