Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Peer-reviewed journal article

ASSESSMENT OF STABILIZING FEEDBACK CONTROL OF WALKING, A TUTORIAL

Jaap H. van DieëniD, Sjoerd M. BruijniD, Maarten AfschriftiD

Abstract

Walking without falling requires stabilization of the trajectory of the body center of mass relative to the base of support. Model studies suggest that this requires active, feedback control, i.e., the nervous system must process sensory information on the state of the body to generate descending motor commands to the muscles to stabilize walking, especially in the mediolateral direction. Stabilization of bipedal gait is challenging and can be impaired in older and diseased individuals. In this tutorial, we illustrate how gait analysis can be used to assess the stabilizing feedback control of gait. We present methods ranging from those that require limited input data (e.g. position data of markers placed on the feet and pelvis only) to those that require full-body kinematics and electromyography. Analyses range from simple kinematics analyses to inverse dynamics. These methods assess stabilizing feedback control of human walking at three levels: 1) the level of center of mass movement and horizontal ground reaction forces, 2) the level of center of mass movement and foot placement and 3) the level of center of mass movement and the joint moments or muscle activity. We show how these can be calculated and provide a GitHub repository (https://github.com/VU-HMS/Tutorial-stabilizing-walking) which contains open access Matlab and Python code to calculate these. Finally, we discuss what information on feedback control can be learned from each of these.

PDFDOICode

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
15
FWCI
13.04
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISAfschrift '21Reimann '24Geng '26Dieën '26Leeuwen '20Lang '25
78% semantic matchNeuroscience
Maarten Afschrift, Friedl De Groote, Ilse Jonkers·PLoS Computational Biology·Jun 25, 2021· 46 citations