Spatiotemporal Distribution of Vector Mosquito Species and Areas at Risk for Arbovirus Transmission in Maricopa County, Arizona
A. B. B. Wilke, D. Damian, M. Litvinova, T. Byrne, A. Zardini, P. Poletti, S. Merler, J.-P. Mutebi, J. Townsend, M. Ajelli
Abstract
Mosquito-borne diseases are a major global public health concern and mosquito surveillance systems are essential for the implementation of effective mosquito control strategies. The objective of our study is to determine the spatiotemporal distribution of vector mosquito species in Maricopa County, AZ from 2011 to 2021, and to identify the hotspot areas for West Nile virus (WNV) and St. Louis Encephalitis virus (SLEV) transmission in 2021. The Maricopa County Mosquito Control surveillance system utilizes BG-Sentinel and EVS-CDC traps throughout the entire urban and suburban areas of the county. We estimated specific mosquito species relative abundance per unit area using the Kernel density estimator in ArcGIS 10.2. We calculated the distance between all traps in the surveillance system and created a 4 km buffer radius around each trap to calculate the extent to which each trap deviated from the mean number of Cx. quinquefasciatus and Cx. tarsalis collected in 2021. Our results show that vector mosquito species are widely distributed and abundant in the urban areas of Maricopa County. A total of 691,170 Culex quinquefasciatus, 542,733 Culex tarsalis, and 292,305 Aedes aegypti were collected from 2011 to 2022. The relative abundance of Ae. aegypti was highly seasonal peaking in the third and fourth quarters of the year. Culex quinquefasciatus, on the other hand, was abundant throughout the year with several regions consistently yielding high numbers of mosquitoes. Culex tarsalis was abundant but it only reached high numbers in well-defined areas bordering natural and rural areas. We also detected high levels of heterogeneity in the risk of WNV and SLEV transmission to humans disregarding traps geographical proximity. The well-defined species-specific spatiotemporal and geographical patterns found in this study can be used to inform vector control operations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Temporal Variation in Mosquito Vector Population Dynamics in Urban Areas
Shengyang Wang, S Garrison Carruth, … André Barretto Bruno Wilke·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2026
- Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus populations in Miami-Dade County, Florida
Chalmers Vasquez, Laura Cristina Multini, … André Barretto Bruno Wilke·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2026
- The abundance and diversity of West Nile virus mosquito vectors in two Regional Units of Greece during the onset of the 2018 transmission season
M. Bisia, C. L. Jeffries, … T. Walker·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2019
- A mosquito survey along a transect of urbanization in Dschang, West Region of Cameroon, reveals potential risk of arbovirus spillovers
M. P. A. Mayi, R. Bamou, … T. Tchuinkam·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2019
- Urban larval mosquito surveillance in Antananarivo, Madagascar: spatiotemporal heterogeneity and associated vector dynamics
Mbolatiana Tovo Andrianjafy, Johnny A. Uelmen, … Ryan M. Carney·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2026
- Molecular Xenomonitoring (MX) allows real-time surveillance of West Nile and Usutu virus in mosquito populations.
Clément Bigeard, Laura Pezzı, … Albin Fontaine·PLoS neglected tropical diseasesPeer-reviewed·Dec 26, 2024