bioRxivEcology
Prioritizing conservation actions for Pacific salmon in Canada
J. C. Walsh, K. Connors, E. Hertz, L. J. Kehoe, T. G. Martin, B. Connors, M. J. Bradford, C. Freshwater, A. Frid, J. Halverson, J. W. Moore, M. H. H. Price, J. D. Reynolds
Abstract
O_LICurrent investment in conservation is insufficient to adequately protect and recover all ecosystems and species. The challenge of allocating limited funds is acute for Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in Canada, which lack a strategic approach to ensure that resources are spent on actions that would cost-effectively recover diminished populations. C_LIO_LIWe applied the Priority Threat Management framework to prioritize strategies that are most likely to maximize the number of thriving Pacific salmon populations on the Central Coast of British Columbia, Canada. These included 79 genetically, ecologically and spatially distinct population groups called Conservation Units (CUs) for five salmon species. This region has high salmon biodiversity and spans the territories of four First Nations: the Heiltsuk, Nuxalk, Kitasoo/Xaixais and Wuikinuxv. C_LIO_LIUsing structured expert elicitation of Indigenous and other experts, we quantified the estimated benefits, costs and feasibility of implementing 10 strategies. Under a business-as-usual scenario (i.e., no additional investments in salmon conservation or management), experts predicted that only one in four CUs would have >50% chance of achieving a thriving status within 20 years. Limiting future industrial development, which was predicted to safeguard CUs from future declines, was identified as the most cost-effective strategy. Investment in three strategies: 1) removal of artificial barriers to fish migration, 2) watershed protection, and 3) stream restoration - at 11.3M CAD per year - was predicted to result in nearly half (34 of 79) of the CUs having a >60% chance of meeting the conservation objective. C_LIO_LIIf all conservation strategies were implemented, experts estimated a >50% probability of achieving a thriving status for 78 of 79 CUs, at an annual cost of 17.3M CAD. However, even with the implementation of all strategies, most sockeye salmon CUs were unlikely to achieve higher probability targets of reaching the objective. C_LIO_LIPolicy implications: We illustrate how Priority Threat Management can incorporate the perspectives and expertise of Indigenous peoples and other experts to evaluate and prioritize conservation strategies based on their cost, benefit and feasibility. Timely investment in the strategies outlined in this assessment could help safeguard and recover Pacific salmon in this region of Canada. C_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Monitoring for fisheries or for fish? Declines in monitoring of salmon spawners continue despite a conservation crisis
Emma M. Atkinson, Bruno Carturan, … Stephanie J. Peacock·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- The coast-wide collapse in marine survival of west coast Chinook and steelhead: slow moving catastrophe or deeper failure?
D. W. Welch, A. D. Porter, E. L. Rechisky·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2018
- Using fisheries risk assessment to inform precautionary and collaborative management in a declining coho salmon fishery
Kyle L. Wilson, William I. Atlas, … Megan S. Adams·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Can the creation of new freshwater habitat demographically offset losses of Pacific salmon from chronic anthropogenic mortality?
P. Gibeau, W. J. Palen, M. J. Bradford·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2020
- Linking habitat and population dynamics to inform conservation benchmarks for data-limited salmon stocks
W. I. Atlas, C. A. Holt, … J. W. Moore·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2021
- Environmental DNA for the enumeration and management of Pacific salmon
T. Levi, J. M. Allen, … D. W. Yu·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2018