Cracking the predictive stability code: dual trial-by-trial spatio-temporo-spectral dynamics of task representation directional tuning by Bayesian conflict expectations
Giada VivianiiD, Antonino VisalliiD, Maria MontefineseiD, Irene Di PietroiD, Antonino VallesiiD, Marı́a RuziD, Ettore AmbrosiniiD
Abstract
Cognitive stability, or task focus, enables goal-directed behavior through representational dynamics: by prioritizing task-relevant representations over competing task-irrelevant ones. Beyond corrective reactive mechanisms operating after conflict arises, stability can be deployed predictively through the statistical learning of conflict regularities, either proactively, guided by global conflict expectations, or through a predictive reactive mode guided by item-specific ones. Yet, the representational mechanisms enabling such predictive adjustments remain underspecified. We addressed this by re-analyzing EEG data from a spatial Stroop task concurrently manipulating list-wide (LWPC) and item-specific (ISPC) proportion congruency. Moving beyond existing analytical approaches, we developed a framework combining trial-by-trial Bayesian conflict-expectancy modeling with a novel spatio-temporo-spectral searchlight Representational Similarity Analysis, and leveraged directional representational modeling complemented by ridge-regression decoding. We first identified the necessary computational substrate for stability predictive reconfigurations: the spatio-temporo-spectral patterns encoding task (Target, Distractor) and conflict-expectancy (LWPC, ISPC) representations, the latter representations encoded already in the pre-stimulus windows. Crucially, conflict expectations modulated Target and Distractor encoding strength with distinct spatio-temporal and spectral dynamics, revealing a functional dissociation. LWPC-induced proactive stability follows a "Target-first" policy, primarily strengthening the Target early post-stimulus via Alpha and lower-Beta patterns, weakening Distractor encoding only later on; conversely, ISPC-induced predictive reactive stability follows a "Distractor-first" policy, rapidly weakening Distractor encoding via response-locked posterior Beta patterns, strengthening the Target only downstream. Our study refines theoretical cognitive control models, incorporating a mechanistic explanation for predictive stability, while also establishing a multidimensional methodological template for interrogating the underlying substrates of adaptive behavior and beyond.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predictive processing for sensory and action neural representations
Gabriela Yukari Iwama, Assaf Breska, Randolph F. Helfrich·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2025
- Neural mechanisms underlying expectation-dependent inhibition of distracting information
Dirk van Moorselaar, Eline Lampers, … Heleen A. Slagter·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2020
- Predicting the irrelevant: Neural effects of distractor predictability depend on load
Troby Ka‐Yan Lui, Jonas Obleser, Malte Wöstmann·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Bayesian mapping reveals that attention boosts neural responses to predicted and unpredicted stimuli
Marta Isabel Garrido, Elise Rowe, … Jason B. Mattingley·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2017
- Diffuse predictions stabilize and reshape the neural code during working memory encoding
Nursena Ataseven, Şahcan Özdemir, … Elkan G. Akyürek·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2026
- Dissociable dynamic effects of expectation during statistical learning.
Hannah H. McDermott, Federico De Martino, … Ryszard Auksztulewicz·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2026