A novel workflow to improve multi-locus genotyping of wildlife species: an experimental set-up with a known model system
Mark A. F. GillinghamiD, B. Karina MonteroiD, Kerstin Wihelm, Kara Grudzus, Simone SommeriD, Pablo Sandro Carvalho SantosiD
Abstract
AO_SCPCAPBSTRACTC_SCPCAPGenotyping novel complex multigene systems is particularly challenging in non-model organisms. Target primers frequently amplify simultaneously multiple loci leading to high PCR and sequencing artefacts such as chimeras and allele amplification bias. Most next-generation sequencing genotyping pipelines have been validated in non-model systems whereby the real genotype is unknown and the generation of artefacts may be highly repeatable. Further hindering accurate genotyping, the relationship between artefacts and copy number variation (CNV) within a PCR remains poorly described. Here we investigate the latter by experimentally combining multiple known major histocompatibility complex (MHC) haplotypes of a model organism (chicken, Gallus gallus, 43 artificial genotypes with 2-13 alleles per amplicon). In addition to well defined "optimal" primers, we simulated a non-model species situation by designing "naive" primers, with sequence data from closely related Galliform species. We applied a novel open-source genotyping pipeline (ACACIA) to the data, and compared its performance with another, previously published, pipeline. ACACIA yielded very high allele calling accuracy (>98%). Non-chimeric artefacts increased linearly with increasing CNV but chimeric artefacts leveled when amplifying more than 4-6 alleles. As expected, we found heterogeneous amplification efficiency of allelic variants when co-amplifying multiple loci. Using our validated ACACIA pipeline and the example data of this study, we discuss in detail the pitfalls researchers should avoid in order to reliably genotype complex multigene systems. ACACIA and the datasets used in this study are publicly available at GitLab and FigShare (https://gitlab.com/psc_santos/ACACIA and https://figshare.com/projects/ACACIA/66485).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Cost-effective, High-throughput, Highly Accurate Genotyping Method for Outbred Populations
Denghui Chen, Apurva S. Chitre, … Abraham A. Palmer·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2024
- Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing facilitates accurate and cost-effective haplotype reconstruction in complex mouse crosses
Samuel J. Widmayer, Lydia K. Wooldridge, … Daniel M. Gatti·Mammalian GenomePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Alignment-Free Microhaplotype Genotyping for GT-seq (Genotyping-in-Thousands by Sequencing) Using a Diploid Abundance Model
Nathan Campbell, Amanda R. Campbell, … Amanda J. Finger·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2026
- More affordable and effective noninvasive SNP genotyping using high-throughput amplicon sequencing
C. E. Eriksson, J. Ruprecht, T. Levi·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2019
- AGAAT: Automated computational tool integrating different genotyping array and correctional methods for data analysis
Anil Prakash, Moinak Banerjee·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2025
- Distinct error rates for reference and non-reference genotypes estimated by pedigree analysis
Richard J. Wang, Predrag Radivojac A, Matthew W. Hahn·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2020