eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Barcode activity in a recurrent network model of the hippocampus enables efficient memory binding
Ching FangiD, Jack W. LindseyiD, Larry F. AbbottiD, Dmitriy AronoviD, Selmaan N. ChettihiD
Abstract
Forming an episodic memory requires binding together disparate elements that co-occur in a single experience. One model of this process is that neurons representing different components of a memory bind to an "index" -- a subset of neurons unique to that memory. Evidence for this model has recently been found in chickadees, which use hippocampal memory to store and recall locations of cached food. Chickadee hippocampus produces sparse, high-dimensional patterns ("barcodes") that uniquely specify each caching event. Unexpectedly, the same neurons that participate in barcodes also exhibit conventional place tuning. It is unknown how barcode activity is generated, and what role it plays in memory formation and retrieval. It is also unclear how a memory index (e.g. barcodes) could function in the same neural population that represents memory content (e.g. place). Here, we design a biologically plausible model that generates barcodes and uses them to bind experiential content. Our model generates barcodes from place inputs through the chaotic dynamics of a recurrent neural network and uses Hebbian plasticity to store barcodes as attractor states. The model matches experimental observations that memory indices (barcodes) and content signals (place tuning) are randomly intermixed in the activity of single neurons. We demonstrate that barcodes reduce memory interference between correlated experiences. We also show that place tuning plays a complementary role to barcodes, enabling flexible, contextually-appropriate memory retrieval. Finally, our model is compatible with previous models of the hippocampus as generating a predictive map. Distinct predictive and indexing functions of the network are achieved via an adjustment of global recurrent gain. Our results suggest how the hippocampus may use barcodes to resolve fundamental tensions between memory specificity (pattern separation) and flexible recall (pattern completion) in general memory systems.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Barcoding of episodic memories in the hippocampus of a food-caching bird
Selmaan N. Chettih, Emily L. Mackevicius, … Dmitriy Aronov·CellPeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2024
- The human hippocampus retroactively binds experiences across time
Xianhui He, Marit Petzka, … Bernhard P. Staresina·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- A dynamic attractor network model of memory formation, reinforcement and forgetting
Marta Boscaglia, Chiara Gastaldi, … Rodrigo Quian Quiroga·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2023
- Are place cells just memory cells? Memory compression leads to spatial tuning and history dependence
Marcus K. Benna, Stefano Fusi·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2021
- Unifying spatial and episodic representations in the hippocampus through flexible memory use
Xiangshuai Zeng, Jon Recalde, … Sen Cheng·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2025
- Organizing the coactivity structure of the hippocampus from robust to flexible memory
Giuseppe P. Gava, Laura Lefèvre, … David Dupret·SciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2024