Sign in
NeuroscienceDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

The Brain Age Gap as a Predictor of Alcohol Initiation in Adolescence

Hollie R. ByrneiD, Rachel VisontayiD, Emma Krogh DevineiD, N. E. Wade, Joanna JacobusiD, A.J. Moore, Lindsay M. SquegliaiD, Louise R. MewtoniD

Abstract

BackgroundGrowing evidence suggests regional and network-level brain imaging features in late childhood are predictive of alcohol use in adolescence. However, the directionality of these effects (i.e. whether they reflect accelerated or delayed neuromaturation) are mixed. We applied a Brain Age Gap Estimation (BrainAGE) model to examine whether overall deviations from typical brain aging trajectories are predictive of (1) alcohol initiation and (2) use behaviour (experimentation versus binge drinking) in adolescence. MethodsData from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study release 6.0 were used. Baseline (ages 9-11) structural imaging features (cortical volume, area, and subcortical volume) were used to estimate BrainAGE. Alcohol use was determined using self-report data from the Substance Use Interview and Timeline Follow-Back across follow-ups (waves 1-6; ages 10-17). Logistic generalized mixed effects models examined whether BrainAGE predicted group status between (1) non-initiators (n=3,639) and initiators (n=1,176), and; (2) experimentation (at least one full drink, no binge episodes; n=461) and binge drinking (at least one episode; n=438). ResultsWhen adjusting for age, sex, and pubertal status, a one-standard-deviation decrease in BrainAGE (equivalent to 1.64 years) at baseline was associated with a 9.5% increase in odds of alcohol initiation in adolescence. However, this effect did not survive adjustment for sociodemographic and prior alcohol exposure covariates. Further, BrainAGE did not discriminate between experimentation and binge drinking. ConclusionsFindings suggest BrainAGE in late childhood may reflect potential risk for alcohol initiation, but not behaviours, in adolescence. However, this association likely reflects complex interactions between brain structure and contextual factors, warranting further investigation.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
top 44%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKamarajan '25Kamarajan '24Whitmore '23Byrne '25Asikin '26Cerro‐León '24
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Chella Kamarajan, Babak Assai Ardekani, Ashwini Kumar Pandey+9 more·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2025· 1 citations