Processing at Phrase Boundaries During Self-Paced Reading
Jenna Hooper, Julia Dengler, Nicoletta BiondoiD, Jacob Odeh, Pooja Mudigonda, Rajesh K. KanaiD, David Basilico, Matthew John NelsoniD
Abstract
Sentence comprehension requires the incremental construction of syntactic structure and semantic interpretation. Prior neural work (Nelson et al., 2017) identified key neural events at major phrase boundaries during sentence comprehension. To investigate a behavioral correlation of these processes, we used self-paced reading to examine the impact of syntactic phase boundaries, semantic congruence, and sentence structure on sentence processing. Participants read object-relative, subject-relative, and canonical control sentences one word at a time and a subsequent comprehension task. Reading times were analyzed relative to phrase boundaries, node-closing operations, and semantic congruence. Object-relative sentences produced the greatest processing difficulty, demonstrated by increased reading times and decreased comprehension accuracy. Reading times peaked at the phrase boundaries, indicating that processing costs are tied to constituent completion rather than individual lexical categories. Reading times also increased with the number of syntactic constituents completed at a phrase boundary. Agent-patient semantic congruence produced its largest effects in object-relative sentences, suggesting that semantic information interacts with syntactic computations when processing demands are greatest. These findings demonstrate that self-paced reading is sensitive to the incremental processing associated with syntactic constituent completion. Processing costs are tied more closely to phrase completion than to individual lexical categories, scale with the amount of syntactic structure completed at a boundary and interact with agent-patient semantic interpretation during object-relative sentence comprehension. Together, these findings support a view of sentence comprehension in which syntactic structure building and semantic interpretation proceed incrementally and interact continuously throughout online language processing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Temporal constraints on the neural signatures of narrative processing
Aline-Priscillia Messi, Abir Bhuyain, Liina Pylkkänen A·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2026
- Diverging Neural Dynamics for Syntactic Structure Building in Naturalistic Speaking and Listening
Laura Giglio, Markus Ostarek, … Peter Hagoort A·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2024
- Grammatical category and the neural processing of phrases.
Amelia Burroughs, Nina Kazanina, Conor J Houghton·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021
- Semantic predictability selectively modulates delta-band syntax tracking: evidence for good-enough parsing
M. Blake Rafferty, Edward C. Brown, Devin M. Casenhiser·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2024
- Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Noun and Verb Processing during Sentence Comprehension in the Brain
Sharmistha Jat, Erika J.C. Laing, … Tom M. Mitchell·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2020
- The spatiotemporal dynamics of bottom-up and top-down processing during at-a-glance reading
Nigel Flower, Liina Pylkkänen A·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2024