bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Systematic analysis of the genomic features involved in the binding preferences of transcription factors
R. RomeroiD, Christophe MenichelliiD, Jean‐Michel MariniD, Sophie LèbreiD, Charles‐Henri LecellieriD, Laurent BréhéliniD
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) orchestrate gene expression and are at the core of cell-specific phenotypes and functions. One given TF can therefore have different binding sites depending on cell type and conditions. However, the TF core motif, as represented by Position Weight Matrix for instance, are often, if not invariably, cell agnostic. Likewise, paralogous TFs recognize very similar motifs while binding different genomic regions. We propose a machine learning approach called TFscope aimed at identifying the DNA features explaining the binding differences observed between two ChIP-seq experiments targeting either the same TF in two cell types or treatments or two paralogous TFs. TFscope systematically investigates differences in i) core motif, ii) nucleotide environment around the binding site and iii) presence and location of co-factor motifs. It provides the main DNA features that have been detected, and the contribution of each of these features to explain the binding differences. TFscope has been applied to more than 350 pairs of ChIP-seq. Our experiments showed that the approach is accurate and that the genomic features distinguishing TF binding in two different settings vary according to the TFs considered and/or the conditions. Several samples are presented and discussed to illustrate these findings. For TFs in different cell types or with different treatments, co-factors and nucleotide environment often explain most of the binding-site differences, while for paralogous TFs, subtle differences in the core motif seem to be the main reason for the observed differences in our experiments. The source code (python), data and results of the experiments described in this article are available at https://gite.lirmm.fr/rromero/tfscope.
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intrinsic specificity differences between transcription factor paralogs partly explain their differential in vivo binding
Ning Shen, Jingkang Zhao, … Raluca Gordân·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2018
- Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers
Jimmy Vandel, Océane Cassan, … Laurent Bréhélin·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2019
- Mocap: Large-scale inference of transcription factor binding sites from chromatin accessibility
Xi Xian Chen, Bowen Yu, … Richard Bonneau·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 6, 2017
- Identification of transcription factor co-binding patterns with non-negative matrix factorization
Ieva Rauluševičiūtė, Timothée Launay, … Anthony Mathelier·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2024
- Dissecting the binding mechanisms of transcription factors to DNA using a statistical thermodynamics framework.
Patrick C. N. Martin, Nicolae Radu Zabet·Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Identification of mammalian transcription factors that bind to inaccessible chromatin
Romana T Pop, Alessandra Pisante, … Nicolae Radu Zabet·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2023