bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Analysis of sparse animal social networks
Helen K. MylneiD, Jackie AbelliD, Colin M. BealeiD, Lauren J. N. BrentiD, Jakob Bro‐JørgenseniD, Kate E Evans, Jordan D. A. HartiD, Dabwiso SakalaiD, Twakundine Simpamba, David Youldon, Daniel Wayne FranksiD
Abstract
Low-density social networks can be common in animal societies, even among species generally considered to be highly social. Social network analysis is commonly used to analyse animal societal structure, but edge weight (strength of association between two individuals) estimation methods designed for dense networks can produce biased measures when applied to low-density networks. Frequentist methods suffer when data availability is low, because they contain an inherent flat prior that will accept any possible edge weight value, and contain no uncertainty in their output. Bayesian methods can accept alternative priors, so can provide more reliable edge weights that include a measure of uncertainty, but they can only reduce bias when sensible prior values are selected. Currently, neither accounts for zero-inflation, so they produce edge weight estimates biased towards stronger associations than the true social network, which can be seen through diagnostic plots of data quality against output estimate. We address this by adding zero-inflation to the model, and demonstrate the process using group-based data from a population of male African savannah elephants. We show that the Bayesian approach performs better than the frequentist to reduce the bias caused by these problems, though the Bayesian requires careful consideration of the priors. We recommend the use of a Bayesian framework, but with a conditional prior that allows the modelling of zero-inflation. This reflects the fact that edge weight derivation is a two-step process: i) probability of ever interacting, and ii) frequency of interaction for those who do. Additional conditional priors could be added where the biology requires it, for example in a society with strong community structure, such as female elephants in which kin structure would create additional levels of social clustering. Although this approach was inspired by reducing bias observed in sparse networks, it could have value for networks of all densities.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A causal framework for the drivers of animal social network structure
Ben Kawam, Julia Ostner, … Daniel Redhead·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 8, 2025
- Inferring the causes of animal social network structure from time-series data
Ben Kawam, Richard L. McElreath, … Oliver Schülke·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2025
- Robust Bayesian analysis of animal networks subject to biases in sampling intensity and censoring
Sebastian Sosa, Mary Brooke McElreath, … Cody T. Ross·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2025
- BISoN: A Bayesian Framework for Inference of Social Networks
J. D. A. Hart, M. N. Weiss, … L. J. N. Brent·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2021
- Assessing bias and robustness of social network metrics using GPS based radio-telemetry data
P. Kaur, S. Ciuti, … M. Salter-Townshend·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2023
- Group size constraints may mask underlying similarities in social structure: a comparison of female elephant societies
N. Shetty, P. Keerthipriya, T. N. C. Vidya·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2017