Sign in
Animal Behavior & CognitionMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Peer-reviewed journal article

Robust Bayesian analysis of animal networks subject to biases in sampling intensity and censoring

Sebastian SosaiD, Mary Brooke McElreathiD, Daniel RedheadiD, Cody T. RossiD

Abstract

Data collection biases are a persistent issue for studies of social networks. This issue has been particularly important in Animal Social Network Analysis (ASNA), where data are unevenly sampled and such biases may potentially lead to incorrect inferences about animal social behavior. Here, we address the issue by developing a Bayesian generative model, which not only estimates network structure, but also explicitly accounts for sampling and censoring biases. Using a set of simulation experiments designed to reflect various sampling and observational biases encountered in real-world scenarios, we systematically validate our model and evaluate its performance relative to other common ASNA methodologies. By accounting for differences in node-level censoring (i.e., the probability of missing an individual interaction.), our model permits the recovery of true latent social connections, even under a wide range of conditions where some key individuals are intermittently unobserved. Our model outperformed all other existing approaches and accurately captured network structure, as well as individual-level and dyad-level effects. Antithetically, permutation-based and simple linear regression aprroaches performed the worst across many conditions. These results highlight the advantages of generative network models for ASNA, as they offer greater flexibility, robustness, and adaptability to real-world data complexities. Our findings underscore the importance of generative models that jointly estimate network structure and adjust for measurement biases typical in empirical studies of animal social behaviour.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
5
FWCI
5.18
Field percentile
top 5%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKawam '25Mylne '24Sosa '21Kawam '25Franks '20Hart '21
71% semantic matchAnimal Behavior & Cognition
Ben Kawam, Richard L. McElreath, Julia Ostner+2 more·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2025· 2 citations