henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Medical GeneticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Whole-genome sequencing analysis of copy number variation (CNV) using low-coverage and paired-end strategies is efficient and outperforms array-based CNV analysis

Bo ZhouiD, Steve S. HoiD, Xianglong ZhangiD, Reenal PattniiD, Rajini HaraksinghiD, Alexander Eckehart UrbaniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

BackgroundCNV analysis is an integral component to the study of human genomes in both research and clinical settings. Array-based CNV analysis is the current first-tier approach in clinical cytogenetics. Decreasing costs in high-throughput sequencing and cloud computing have opened doors for the development of sequencing-based CNV analysis pipelines with fast turnaround times. We carry out a systematic and quantitative comparative analysis for several low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (WGS) strategies to detect CNV in the human genome.\n\nMethodsWe compared the CNV detection capabilities of WGS strategies (short-insert, 3kb-, and 5kb-insert mate-pair) each at 1x, 3x, and 5x coverages relative to each other and to 17 currently used high-density oligonucleotide arrays. For benchmarking, we used a set of Gold Standard (GS) CNVs generated for the 1000-Genomes-Project CEU subject NA12878.\n\nResultsOverall, low-coverage WGS strategies detect drastically more GS CNVs compared to arrays and are accompanied with smaller percentages of CNV calls without validation. Furthermore, we show that WGS (at [≥]1x coverage) is able to detect all seven GS deletion-CNVs >100 kb in NA12878 whereas only one is detected by most arrays. Lastly, we show that the much larger 15 Mbp Cri-du-chat deletion can be readily detected with short-insert paired-end WGS at even just 1x coverage.\n\nConclusionsCNV analysis using low-coverage WGS is efficient and outperforms the array-based analysis that is currently used for clinical cytogenetics.

Citations
95
FWCI
8.59
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWhitford '19Gabrielaitė '21Rao '20Demidov '22Lee '22Vega '24
71% semantic matchGenomics
Whitney Whitford, Klaus Lehnert, Russell G. Snell+1 more·Journal of Biomedical Informatics·Apr 6, 2019· 39 citations