Assessment of batch-correction methods for scRNA-seq data with a new test metric
Maren BüttneriD, Zhichao MiaoiD, F. Alexander WolfiD, Sarah Amalia TeichmanniD, Fabian Joachim TheisiD
Abstract
Single-cell transcriptomics is a versatile tool for exploring heterogeneous cell populations. As with all genomics experiments, batch effects can hamper data integration and interpretation. The success of batch effect correction is often evaluated by visual inspection of dimension-reduced representations such as principal component analysis. This is inherently imprecise due to the high number of genes and non-normal distribution of gene expression. Here, we present a k-nearest neighbour batch effect test (kBET, https://github.com/theislab/kBET) to quantitatively measure batch effects. kBET is easier to interpret, more sensitive and more robust than visual evaluation and other measures of batch effects. We use kBET to assess commonly used batch regression and normalisation approaches, and quantify the extent to which they remove batch effects while preserving biological variability. Our results illustrate that batch correction based on log-transformation or scran pooling followed by ComBat reduced the batch effect while preserving structure across data sets. Finally we show that kBET can pinpoint successful data integration methods across multiple data sets, in this case from different publications all charting mouse embryonic development. This has important implications for future data integration efforts, which will be central to projects such as the Human Cell Atlas where data for the same tissue may be generated in multiple locations around the world.\n\n[Before final publication, we will upload the R package to Bioconductor]
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 511
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Correcting batch effects in single-cell RNA sequencing data by matching mutual nearest neighbours.
Laleh Haghverdi, Aaron T. L. Lun, … John C. Marioni·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2018
- Case-specific selection of batch correction methods for integrating single-cell transcriptomic data from different sources
Xiaoyue Hu, Li He, … Hangjin Jiang·bioRxiv·May 26, 2024
- Erasure of Biologically Meaningful Signal by Unsupervised scRNAseq Batch-correction Methods
Scott R. Tyler, Ernesto Guccione, Eric E. Schadt·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2021
- Batch correction methods used in single cell RNA-sequencing analyses are often poorly calibrated
Sindri Emmanúel Antonsson, Páll Melsted·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2024
- Flexible comparison of batch correction methods for single-cell RNA-seq using BatchBench
Ruben Chazarra-Gil, Stijn van Dongen, … Martin Hemberg·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2021
- Batch Effect Correction of RNA-seq Data through Sample Distance Matrix Adjustment
Teng Fei, Tianwei Yu·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2020