Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
A Bayesian predictive approach for dealing with pseudoreplication
Stanley E. LaziciD, Jack R. MelloriD, Michael C. AshbyiD, Marcus Robert MunafoiD
Abstract
Pseudoreplication occurs when the number of measured values or data points exceeds the number of genuine replicates, and when the statistical analysis treats all data points as independent and thus fully contributing to the result. By artificially inflating the sample size, pseudoreplication contributes to irreproducibility, and it is a pervasive problem in biological research. In some fields, more than half of published experiments have pseudoreplication - making it one of the biggest threats to inferential validity. Researchers may be reluctant to use appropriate statistical methods if their hypothesis is about the pseudoreplicates and not the genuine replicates; for example, when an intervention is applied to pregnant female rodents (genuine replicates) but the hypothesis is about the effect on the multiple offspring (pseudoreplicates). We propose using a Bayesian predictive approach, which enables researchers to make valid inferences about biological entities of interest, even if they are pseudoreplicates, and show the benefits of this approach using two in vivo data sets.
- Citations
- 50
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- What exactly is ‘N’ in cell culture and animal experiments?
Stanley E. Lazic, Charlie J. Clarke-Williams, Marcus Robert Munafo·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2018
- Statistics in service of metascience: Measuring replication distance with reproducibility rate
Erkan O. Buzbas, Berna Devezer·EntropyPeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2024
- Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution
Brandon S. Coventry, Edward L. Bartlett·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2024
- Statistical power and false positive rates for interdependent outcomes are strongly influenced by test type: Implications for behavioral neuroscience
Michelle A. Frankot, Peyton M. Mueller, … Cole Vonder Haar·NeuropsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·May 4, 2023
- Inflated False Negative Rates Undermine Reproducibility In Task-Based fMRI
Gabriele Lohmann, Johannes Stelzer, … Klaus Scheffler·bioRxiv·Mar 31, 2017
- Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science
The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative, Olavo B. Amaral, … Igor L. Baptista·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2025