Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution
Abstract
Typical statistical practices in the biological sciences have been increasingly called into question due to difficulties in replication of an increasing number of studies, many of which are confounded by the relative difficulty of null significance hypothesis testing designs and interpretation of p-values. Bayesian inference, representing a fundamentally different approach to hypothesis testing, is receiving renewed interest as a potential alternative or complement to traditional null significance hypothesis testing due to its ease of interpretation and explicit declarations of prior assumptions. Bayesian models are more mathematically complex than equivalent frequentist approaches, which have historically limited applications to simplified analysis cases. However, the advent of probability distribution sampling tools with exponential increases in computational power now allows for quick and robust inference under any distribution of data. Here we present a practical tutorial on the use of Bayesian inference in the context of neuroscientific studies. We first start with an intuitive discussion of Bayes rule and inference followed by the formulation of Bayesian-based regression and ANOVA models using data from a variety of neuroscientific studies. We show how Bayesian inference leads to easily interpretable analysis of data while providing an open-source toolbox to facilitate the use of Bayesian tools. Significance StatementBayesian inference has received renewed interest as an alternative to null-significance hypothesis testing for its interpretability, ability to incorporate prior knowledge into current inference, and robust model comparison paradigms. Despite this renewed interest, discussions of Bayesian inference are often obfuscated by undue mathematical complexity and misunderstandings underlying the Bayesian inference process. In this article, we aim to empower neuroscientists to adopt Bayesian statistical inference by providing a practical methodological walkthrough using single and multi-unit recordings from the rodent auditory circuit accompanied by a well-documented and user-friendly toolkit containing regression and ANOVA statistical models commonly encountered in neuroscience.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evidence for the null hypothesis in functional magnetic resonance imaging using group-level Bayesian inference
Ruslan S. Masharipov, Irina Knyazeva, … Maxim V. Kireev·Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2021
- An Implementation of Empirical Bayesian Inference and Non-Null Bootstrapping for Threshold Selection and Power Estimation in Multiple and Single Statistical Testing
Bahman Nasseroleslami·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2019
- Bayesian inference of population prevalence
Robin A. A. Ince, Angus Paton, … Philippe G. Schyns·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2021
- Bayesian Encoding and Decoding as Distinct Perspectives on Neural Coding
Richard D. Lange, Sabyasachi Shivkumar, … Ralf M. Haefner·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2023
- Using computational theory to constrain statistical models of neural data
Scott W. Linderman, Samuel Joseph Gershman·Current Opinion in NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2017
- An empirically-driven guide on using Bayes Factors for M/EEG decoding
Lina Teichmann, Denise Moerel, … Tijl Grootswagers·Aperture NeuroPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2022