Ensemble of deep learning language models to support the creation of living systematic reviews for the COVID-19 literature
Julien KnafouiD, Quentin Haas, Nikolay BorissoviD, Michel Jacques CounotteiD, Nicola N LowiD, Hira ImeriiD, Aziz Mert IpekciiD, Diana Buitrago‐GarcíaiD, Leonie HeroniD, Poorya AminiiD, Douglas TeodoroiD
Abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented amount of scientific publications, growing at a pace never seen before. Multiple living systematic reviews have been developed to assist professionals with up-to-date and trustworthy health information, but it is increasingly challenging for systematic reviewers to keep up with the evidence in electronic databases. We aimed to investigate deep learning-based machine learning algorithms to classify COVID-19 related publications to help scale-up the epidemiological curation process. MethodsIn this retrospective study, five different pre-trained deep learning-based language models were fine-tuned on a dataset of 6,365 publications manually classified into two classes, three subclasses and 22 sub-subclasses relevant for epidemiological triage purposes. In a k-fold cross-validation setting, each standalone model was assessed on a classification task and compared against an ensemble, which takes the standalone model predictions as input and uses different strategies to infer the optimal article class. A ranking task was also considered, in which the model outputs a ranked list of sub-subclasses associated with the article. ResultsThe ensemble model significantly outperformed the standalone classifiers, achieving a F1-score of 89.2 at the class level of the classification task. The difference between the standalone and ensemble models increases at the sub-subclass level, where the ensemble reaches a micro F1-score of 70% against 67% for the best performing standalone model. For the ranking task, the ensemble obtained the highest recall@3, with a performance of 89%. Using an unanimity voting rule, the ensemble can provide predictions with higher confidence on a subset of the data, achieving detection of original papers with a F1-score up to 97% on a subset of 80% of the collection instead of 93% on the whole dataset. ConclusionThis study shows the potential of using deep learning language models to perform triage of COVID-19 references efficiently and support epidemiological curation and review. The ensemble consistently and significantly outperforms any standalone model. Fine-tuning the voting strategy thresholds is an interesting alternative to annotate a subset with higher predictive confidence.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multi-label topic classification for COVID-19 literature annotation using an ensemble model based on PubMedBERT
Shubo Tian, Jinfeng Zhang·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2021
- Information retrieval in an infodemic: the case of COVID-19 publications
Douglas Teodoro, Sohrab Ferdowsi, … Poorya Amini·Journal of Medical Internet ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2021
- deepMINE - Natural Language Processing based Automatic Literature Mining and Research Summarization for Early Stage Comprehension in Pandemic Situations specifically for COVID-19
Bhrugesh Joshi, Vishvajit Bakarola, … Ramar Krishnamurthy·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2020
- Analyzing the vast coronavirus literature with CoronaCentral
Jake Lever, Russ Biagio Altman·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2021
- Machine Learning Maps Research Needs in COVID-19 Literature
A. L. Doanvo, X. Qian, … M. S. Majumder·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2020
- Comparative assessment of machine learning algorithms to predict severity of disease in COVID-19 patients based on eight cofactors
Tanviben Patel, Daxesh P. Patel, … Pranav S. Shrivastav·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2024