Reduced visitation to the buzz-pollinated Cyanella hyacinthoides in the presence of other pollen sources in the hyperdiverse Cape Floristic Region
Abstract
Many plant species have floral morphologies that restrict access to floral resources, such as pollen or nectar, and only a subset of floral visitors can perform the complex handling behaviours required to extract restricted resources. Due to the time and energy required to extract resources from morphologically complex flowers, these plant species potentially compete for pollinators with co-flowering plants that have more easily accessible resources. A widespread floral mechanism restricting access to pollen is the presence of tubular anthers that open through small pores or slits (poricidal anthers). Some bees have evolved the capacity to remove pollen from poricidal anthers using vibrations, giving rise to the phenomenon of buzz-pollination. These bee vibrations that are produced for pollen extraction are presumably energetically costly, and to date, few studies have investigated whether buzz-pollinated flowers may be at a disadvantage when competing for pollinators attention with plant species that present unrestricted pollen resources. Here, we studied Cyanella hyacinthoides (Tecophilaeaceae), a geophyte with poricidal anthers in the hyperdiverse Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, to assess how the composition and relative abundance of flowers with easily accessible pollen affect bee visitation to a buzz-pollinated plant. We found that the number of pollinator species was not influenced by community composition. However, visitation rates to C. hyacinthoides were negatively related to the abundance of flowers with more accessible resources. Visitation rates were strongly associated with petal colour, showing that flower colour is important in mediating these interactions. We conclude that buzz-pollinated plants might be at a competitive disadvantage when many easily accessible pollen sources are available, particularly when competitor species share its floral signals.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differential effectiveness of bee and beetle pollinators creates flower colour polymorphism
Jonathan Heinze, Casper J. van der Kooi, Johannes Spaethe·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2026
- Transmission of vibrations in buzz-pollinated plant species with disparate floral morphologies
L. Nevard, A. Russell, … M. Vallejo-Marin·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2021
- Anther cones increase pollen release in buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers
M. Vallejo-Marin, C. E. Pereira Nunes, A. L. Russell·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2021
- Pollen dispensing schedules in buzz-pollinated plants: Experimental comparison of species with contrasting floral morphologies
J. E. Kemp, M. Vallejo-Marin·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2020
- The role of secondary pollinators in the evolution of complex colour signals in a bimodal pollination system
Katharine L. Khoury, Jon Ågren, … Ethan Newman·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2026
- Bee and floral traits affect the characteristics of the vibrations experienced by flowers during buzz-pollination
B. Arroyo-Correa, C. E. Beattie, M. Vallejo-Marin·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019